>>4693908 (LB)
No, but I bet an internet search can. Spend a little time looking up colloquial uses of it after you get done going and fucking yourself
Over the holidays, I showed my die-hard Dem stepdad a bunch of pics and video of Biden groping kids. He said it looked fine and I was seeing creepery when it probably wasn't there, and that you could probably make a similar reel of any public figure that had been in the public eye for 40 years. Then my mom said the pics and vids were probably fake because she'd seen the stuff the Deep State pushed about deep fakes back when the Hilary video was supposed to come out.
Both of these people are highly intelligent, and Ivy-League educated. They are also deeply indoctrinated. The point being people will literally dismiss compelling evidence that doesn't fit in with their world view if they aren't told about it by their pals on CNN.
If the truth is as outlandish as the most far-out anons are saying, do you think people are going to be interested, willing, or able to accept that Hilary is a Satan-worshipping lesbian moonchild weirdo who cuts the skin off kids' heads and dances around with it on like a mask?
Nailing people on RICO and tax-evasion charges is sadly the best option because people will generally accept that it's plausible, although some will insist it's a frame-job.
Ironically, taking down some of the Deep State dildos will probably create a new class of conspiracy researchers that are convinced that the Deep State is the victim of an orchestrated conspiracy of vengeance by unhinged right-wingers dead-set on robbing the country blind and creating a dystopian Handmaid's Tale future.