Thought re >>465258

This means two things:

1. POTUS takes the utmost care to listen to actual patriots here. Patriots would need to speak up more to be heard.

2. Shills coming in here have a defined mission: manufacture consensus. I have no doubt NSA's capabilities easily filter out the shills from the patriots, so their voices aren't taken into account, but this is, first and foremost, a MIND GAME. A battle to win over our thoughts. We cannot let this happen.

As such, our task here on this board expands a little. I was always a little wary of moraleboosting posts, seeing them as something between chatfagging and a distraction, even though I recognized the importance, but keeping morale up may now be one of the more important missions for the board.

Remember the tactics shills used. They tried to discredit Q, they tried to paint him as incapable of protecting us, they tried to paint him and POTUS as just some other arms of the Cabal. Don't fall for it.

They want us divided. We will not be divided. We will fight. As long and hard as it takes. Victory is non-negotiable.

>>469866

You misunderstand what we're saying.

We're not saying no kids died there, that may have happened.

We're saying this was a False Flag operation. A targeted kill to push the narrative in the direction THEY want. Think Archduke Ferdinand.

We will remember those who died. We will honor their memory, as victims of the Cabal. But we will call this out for what it was - a False Flag, orchestrated by the Cabal and MSM to try to disarm the USA. There were too many (((coincidences))) with the way it was reported, with the way kids were behaving, the teachers, the cop who got shot and miraculously survived >15 bullet-holes and was visited by Sheriff fucking Israel.

If you need concrete proof to believe things, you are not exercising your rational thought ability.

>>469948

This. This is all a battle for the midterms now. They are trying so hard to latch on the guns == republican theme to sway the elections. We cannot let them.

>>470084

>Proving a negative

that's not how it works