>>469733

no, more likely 14 of the [19] live. youll have to reference previous posts but stated [19] would cease to exist.

Think Nuclear Stand-off

Think MAD

Operators were mentioned near number 19 'in field' very old post. The 19 doesnt reference operators, they are targets. [14] live.

@

>>466412

I meant >>466142

>>469952

Anon, when Q says you are watching a movie,

He means Narrative Directors/Pushers/MSM have decided to Ham-up this shooting and exhaust every effort to manipulate people.

Divided…SLAVE SHEEP DISTRACTED,

so we get to one of those issues guns.

Formula:

Public gaining momentum?

Find Event relating to political 'hot-buton'

I.E. Immigration, Birth Control/Abortion, White Cop shoots non-white suspect, climate, GUNS

Ham this story up, make it a production, a movie. DIVIDE public over divisive issues, where there is no obvious 1 step solution.

He doesnt mean this was a staged event,

Now, there were reports of drills being done simulating a school shooting there a week prior. yes WEIRD.

Shootings happen every day, and school shootings happen every year.

It is tragic, but the media picks what story it likes. You took logic, so assuming you know Appeal to the Mob fallacy and false choice:

"You DO love the little children dont you."

The movie, is a drama staged, a 'play' off real tragic event that is deemed palatable for the masses. Your emotions are now flared-up; they should be.

But without maturity or discipline, the emotional are manipulated.

>>469954

youre grumpy, what do you care? what are YOUR thoughts.

>>470141

lol

>>470158

Its cool, will say I'll eat my own fist if zero kids died. Pretty confident that dead redneck hero Coach would say there was a school shooting._X

>>470181

Hah

Well Mr. Logic

Im appealing to authority>President

>first responders

do you really think Trump would participate in an anti-2nd amendment charade with no dead kids/fake shooting?

Your premise suggests P would knowingly participate in misleading the people, or that, he lacks the intel network to verify event.

And if you hold that premise it contradicts what was built by Q posts here. You cannot have that in a syllogism, two premises contradicting each other.

It doesn't fit who he is, what Q has said, or what we've seen, you know, the past 2 years.

Again I will eat my own fist if you can prove me wrong. I dont want to be mean and discourage you or humiliate you so please dont be

>smug.

>>470275

… ok 1 sec.

>>470230

Good

>>470300

oh you seemed grumpy to me so I responded to you. I shouldnt have said anything either way. Should be digging right now…

But I thought maybe other anons were thinking that, and its wrong. I wanted to spare them that rabbit-hole so they can focus elsewhere._X

>>470369

Yes

Back at you_X

>>470402

Q uses movie references book references as signatures. He's not lying to us. He doesnt need too. He is ambiguous purposefully and with precision. "Double meanings detract sniffers" _Q

>>470445

hard to read… first thought:

Laundered tax payer dollars to terrorists and then million dollar bribes back to CF?

…

>>470483

Agreed. Think the correct angle is to research senate intel docs, find quotes, and combine that with research on "Loudest voices" Talking heads'

@MSM

It may be obvious to us they're fake: They are contracting former Clowns as analysts.

The public needs to immunized from MSM.

Talking heads: their history, their family, their money I.E. A.Cooper interned Clown In Action OP_MOCKINGBIRD.

Combine with documents graphics, hyperlinks.

At top of bread an anon gave his take on senate docs already.

Counter-strike works better then defense. We've been in defence over fake russia, but that was a feint that gives cause to expose THEM.

Good Hunting_X