Anonymous ID: dd8c5f Jan. 10, 2019, 3:17 p.m. No.4700353   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0380 >>0383 >>0388

>>4700234

>Yeah, I'm down.

Great. We're still here to help.

>I'll remember the dang title next time. kek.

No worries, mistakes happen, very easy to do when battling internet issues I know. I'm gonna report the title change request (using the report function) for BO/BV. If it's just one error (number or title) I usually do the report right on the OP itself. Since there's more than one error, I'll detail it below and link the OP for them. Then report this post.

 

BO/BV Change Bread Title & # Please?

>>4700129

#5598 New Baker Baby Baking Bodacious Bread →

Q Research General: #5998 New Baker Baby Baking Bodacious Bread Edition

Anonymous ID: dd8c5f Jan. 10, 2019, 3:19 p.m. No.4700380   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0388

>>4700353

Shit, I'm outta practice. Put the colon in the wrong place lel.

 

BO/BV Change Bread Title & # Please?

 

>>4700129 (OP)

#5598 New Baker Baby Baking Bodacious Bread →

 

Q Research General #5998: New Baker Baby Baking Bodacious Bread Edition

Anonymous ID: dd8c5f Jan. 10, 2019, 3:28 p.m. No.4700514   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0553 >>0654 >>0906

>>4700292

This is not a legit Q-clock analysis.

>:21 minute marker (vertical mirror)

There is no such thing as a vertical mirror (aka no significance to any angle other than 180)

>Q post #1111 = 11/11 (date lines up with today)

Dates = dates

minutes = minutes

Post sequence #'s never become dates

Anonymous ID: dd8c5f Jan. 10, 2019, 3:45 p.m. No.4700723   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0736 >>0762

>>4700535

Can you specify which post you're talking about anon? ty

 

>>4700595

Looking good baker.

You may want to remove the repeat(s) shown. And if the bun gets too big by the end, you may want to consider paring it down. Depending on your particular priorities, maybe some of the general info ones on new military equipment can go. Alternatively the JonBenet one and/or helicopter accident, since they're still pretty tangential to QR.

Anonymous ID: dd8c5f Jan. 10, 2019, 3:50 p.m. No.4700811   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0906

>>4700553

>You know nothing.

On the contrary. I was here for the whole devising of the clock,and witnessed many proofs from clockfags when it was still functioning properly. I've provided you standard rules how the Q-clock runs by, and was specific in how this analysis deviated from them. I'm a fan of the clock, which is why I defend the tool against shilling.

Anonymous ID: dd8c5f Jan. 10, 2019, 3:56 p.m. No.4700906   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0936

>>4700762

>Seriously, we're falling for this?

>This clockfagging shit is getting ridiculous.

I'm not falling for fake clocks, anon. See:

>>4700514, >>4700811

I agree most of what's put out as Q-clock analysis here in recent months has been total shill work, meant to be ridiculous so our movement is ridiculed.