Anonymous ID: 157d2d Jan. 10, 2019, 5:05 p.m. No.4701966   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4701927

>>4701902

lawfag here

here you go anon

a little dank for non lawfags but basically she got it wrong

 

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretations/the-suspension-clause-by-amy-barrett-and-neal-katyal

Anonymous ID: 157d2d Jan. 10, 2019, 5:07 p.m. No.4701996   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4701927

here is the upshot

 

"The Suspension Clause follows in this tradition. It protects the writ by imposing a general bar on its suspension. At the same time, it makes an exception for cases when an invasion or rebellion endangers the public safety. A suspension is temporary, but the power it confers is extraordinary. When a suspension is in effect, the president, typically acting through subordinates, can imprison people indefinitely without any judicial check.

 

The Clause does not specify which branch of government has the authority to suspend the privilege of the writ, but most agree that only Congress can do it"

 

NO MOST do not agree with that at all esp POTUS