Anonymous ID: 6fe4c1 Jan. 10, 2019, 8:08 p.m. No.4704701   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4704669

>We'll see.

Yes, we'll see.

There's a reason to not assume anything. Shills are here constantly trying to get us to believe untruths just so they can go mainstream and claim we believe stupid shit that they made up. (They're poo-poo heads.)

Anonymous ID: 6fe4c1 Jan. 10, 2019, 8:12 p.m. No.4704747   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4704699

I was present when Q answered that question. I believe the message the initial post refers to is more explicit.

 

If it is not, well, then Q may have pulled a fast one. I am pretty good about checking details like this and I don't remember that ass a gap, but it is possible. I don't think so, though.

 

If you're motivated, go back and dig it out and see if it is a gap. If you succeed, you'll be applauded here, elevated to full anon status and called a faggot.

Anonymous ID: 6fe4c1 Jan. 10, 2019, 8:19 p.m. No.4704847   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4704825

>At what point do people realize that selling their privacy for convenience or cheaper products is not a good thing?

At the very instant they perceive the cost of losing their privacy as higher than their perception of what they're getting.

 

Simple, really.