>>54854

Good graphic anon. As someone who's skeptical of Q in general, there's some good stuff there that solidify his connects to POTUS, etc.

Frankly, I'm calling bullshit on this though:

https:// archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/uid/UfwCzQ1I/order/asc/

… as the description "Megs" gives doesn't seem to at all match the analysis she posted:

https:// www.cert.pl/en/news/single/a-deeper-look-at-tofsee-modules/

However, Megs has allegedly verified that she did indeed post that via a Reddit comment. Does anyone know how Megs' Reddit account was verified to be her?

Also, if Q = The Great Wizard, would love a partial explanation of what went down Oct 2016.

Just a thought: rather than a hashtag like #greatawakening, etc, is it not worth referencing something from old that has official documentation to substantiate it?

For example, I would've thought #operationmockingbird, #cointelpro or something like that might serve as better hashtags because it's using what's been proven in the past to give credence to what's happening again now in the present.

>what is operation mockingbird?

<google operation mockingbird

>operation mockingbird wiki article

<normies mind's btfo

No offence, but I think Q let y'all down here.

For all the hype, pretty fucking weak payload.

>>79263

There's no code in there. It's a slug.

I think, at this point in time, it looks like Q was playing everybody. That page looks like it could've been written in less than an hour.