Anonymous ID: 20c98d Jan. 10, 2019, 11:18 p.m. No.4706694   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6749

>>4706554

Anon, first, it was a new baker on breads 5997 and 5998. Although this content was reposted in 5998, there was no

baker

or

notable

called out in redtext to grab baker's attention.

Second, even experienced baker's miss things. To cry "baker intentionally removed!" or "baker is comped" is to wrongly attribute ill intent to your fellow anons who work for free, especially a new baker. Are you a grown patriot or a petulant teenager?

 

The notables buns getting mixed up is a separate issue, and it looks like those were fixed. On bread 5999 when you complained to baker about the missed twats, baker asked you to repost them to be included next bread. Did you? If not, would you consider reposting them in this bread and seeing whether anons would nominate to go in this bread's notables? That's the usual course for issues of missed notables, just repost and ask again later. But the key is to repost โ€“ not just repeat your complaint that something got missed.

 

But if you feel you could do a better job than the average baker, plz learn to bake and join the team. You might discover it takes a lot more of your attention than you thought, and that perspective might help you be easier on bakers moving forward when they aren't able to be perfect every time.

Anonymous ID: 20c98d Jan. 10, 2019, 11:23 p.m. No.4706723   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4706633

baker

>>4706578

Disagree this is notable. It's just unsauced, speculative disinfo. The Hebrew origins of the name, however, are linguistically established. This anon is all for including info on Jews and Israel in notes when it aligns with Q content, but not at the expense of getting too loosey-goosey.

Anonymous ID: 20c98d Jan. 10, 2019, 11:31 p.m. No.4706773   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6786

>>4706748

Fucking exactly. I mean, it would be one thing if it were a digg, something born of an autist's or collection of autists' unique dot-connecting insights that can only be found here. But crying this hard over fucking POTUS twats not getting into notables right away while we're training a new baker? The fuck!

 

>with a notion also to include the other anons that asked what happened

Jesus but you are one fucked up entitled nigger bitch, aren't you? (how's that for namecalling?)

>IMO baking is NOT difficult

Then do it. Put up or shut up.

FFS.

Anonymous ID: 20c98d Jan. 10, 2019, 11:47 p.m. No.4706867   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6916 >>7024

>>4706796

Dude don't even worry about it, this faggot crying his whiny muh notables bullshit has his priorities all turned around. A new baker is worth 100 of these (you)mining bitches posting fucking twat caps.

>Just wanting to help. Appreciated all the support earlier

You bet, we really are always excited to have new bakers step up, you did well for your first bake (my initial fuck-ups are still memorable even after these many long months kek)

>thatโ€™s as awesome and encouraging and look forward to doing it more (and obviously not fucking up)

Wew, I wish fuck ups could be banished that easily kek. All we can ask of ourselves and each other is that we bust our balls to get as much right as we can, and have each others' backs when we miss a few corners. Baker team is solid, usually always someone lurking to help call attention to missed stuff.

Anonymous ID: 20c98d Jan. 11, 2019, 12:14 a.m. No.4707038   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7072

>>4706916

>This is the best place on the internet

It's a special thing we've got here. Love back atcha. Really sorry about your week, esp. about loss of grams. Rough stuff. Hang in there new bakeranon, we'll be here. If you're up nights, you oughtta try baking later next time โ€“ breads slower.

 

>>4706812

Will always defend the truth and my fellow patriots. Will always call whiny bitches whiny bitches. Not my problem you were on the wrong side of that.