Anonymous ID: bf0efd Jan. 11, 2019, 2:10 a.m. No.4708222   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4708197

Yeah, in a general round about way. Was she put in by Clinton (i.e. the cabal) to ensure abortions keep flowing?

She also had a hand in an environmental decision that allowed for lawsuits to claim harm as in the harm the visual, and recreational aesthetic of land to prevent development. I could see that being used to help ensure a comprehensive border could be challenged if it ever came up in the future?

I don't know. Q has linked Red/Green castles to the ACOE, National Emergency, and The Wall.

Then Q linked that to RBG….whom has extremely similar initials to RBG.

Dammit. I feel like we're missing something obvious.

Anonymous ID: bf0efd Jan. 11, 2019, 2:16 a.m. No.4708266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8300

>>4708234

Tbh I think the nuke plant is a red herring as some other Anon mentioned. It seems juicy by nature, but it feels like it's reaching. I think the difference needs to center around the connection between the ACOE, The Wall, RBG and a mystery Blue Castle of some kind.

Sorry for shitting up the bread so bad.

Anonymous ID: bf0efd Jan. 11, 2019, 2:22 a.m. No.4708335   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4708257

If a woman is selected as the nominee does that eliminate the wrap up smear re: sexual assault?

(Not entirely. They can go after her husband, or other male family member. They can also claim she protected a sexual predator. They can also claim she slept her way to certain positions.)

What other tactics might be planned to block and/or force name removal

(Claims that she is pro-life and will overturn RvW for religious reasons…in short, attack her religion)