Anonymous ID: 624bec Jan. 11, 2019, 3:23 a.m. No.4708825   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8927

>>4708257

 

Q, appreciate that plausible deniability is necessary, but could we get some clarification as to what some of the long ago BOOMs were? If only to help calibrate what does, and does not, qualify for BOOM status.

Anonymous ID: 624bec Jan. 11, 2019, 4:24 a.m. No.4709195   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4708927

 

Thank you, fren. I have to recalibrate my expectations of what is boom-worthy down. I don't think anyone would question that significant progress towards a Nork peace deal is boomworthy….I don't think 4 BOOMs, one of which is literally just reaffirming the previous agreeements…is quite right.

 

Nor sure taking a hooking website down counts either. Arrest and flip a major trafficker with dirt on majot higher ups to trade for lenienct? Sure. Website down…not so much.

 

If I think WWII pacific BOOM BOOM BOOM….

I go firebombing Tokyo BOOM

Hiroshima…BOOM

Nagasaki BOOM

 

Not BOOM BOOM BOOM…we got three of their dive bombers while they were sinking the bulk of our pacific fleet at pearl.