Wilbur Ross, US Commerce Secretary is in China. He is there to reiterate the President's stance that China must come to the table. Sanctions have not hurt the US economy, but China faces peasant uprisings.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Wilbur+Ross+in+China&t=h_&ia=web
I have to laugh. I am such a fan of President Trump and his ability to lead the "True Enemy of the People" around by the nose. They truly don't know what they are dealing with.
Case in point. When Trump looks weak, he is the strongest. He is the King at misdirection. He makes a weak ass statement about Mexico paying for the wall indirectly through trade concessions - a deal that has not yet been approved. On Q the MSM attacks full on to discredit this statement. And I wonder, what is the misdirect? He wants them focused here, so what is there?
Is it China? Is it something else? Maybe it is China trade talks, but Q directs our attention there, so maybe not. Is it the RBG replacement? Q directs us there, so maybe not. One thing I'm certain of, it is not Mexico paying for the wall. Kek
Same thing really. Each single gene encodes one protein. If the gene is malfunctioning (mutated) or missing, no protein. So same same.
Has anyone made the connection between this guy and the other homosexual white guy famous for drugging (and killing) black men?
You know who I'm talking about: Jeffrey Dahmer.
>>4708675 pb
Rh doesn't mean a monkey-derived gene. It is a blood group marker that was first discovered on rhesus monkeys. The Rh marker is common on many mammals. This is a common misconception based on the name and not on the reality. So, Rh- just means you are missing this gene-derived protein marker from the surface of your red blood cells. It has nothing to do with whether you are a chimp or not. Also, be careful when digging because there is so much garbage out there regarding the Rh bloodgroup and Rh- in particular. If you want to dig, dig the research articles, not the blog posts.
>There's so much garbage because it's very significant. I wonder if that's the reason the evolution psyop was created? To create a false narrative on how monkey blood got into humans?
I tend to think it is more an example of confirmation bias. Coming up with theories is grand. But theories need to be tested with facts. If you just take a theory as fact without testing and then build a construct based on it and call it the truth - that is circular logic and usually just bullshit. Best to always start at the basics and test the original theory.