just working through the drops, but find the pre-4am timing poignant.
there must have been a MSM RGB fake news blitz prepped for today.
>4709019
>4709002
>4709045
If people would put half the time & creative effort in discussing positive alternative solutions that they do yammering on about endless SHTF scenarios, we'd be way further along than we are.
>>4708257 ——–——– If a woman is selected as the nominee
Why is everyone assuming that ACB will be the nominee?
Is she the only woman on POTUS' potential SC list?
No other female judges out there?
Also agree not practical due to age, but seeing JJ go up against Kamala & Hirono would be hella entertaining.
Thanks anon. I see 5 women there
>Amy Coney Barrett of Indiana, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
>Allison Eid of Colorado, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
>Joan Larsen of Michigan, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
>Margaret Ryan of Virginia, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
>Diane Sykes of Wisconsin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Concur. Specific dates and specific events happening specific ways based on specific assumptions.
>e.g. Amy in
>Don't confuse free-market to mean ONLY an anarcho-capitalist economic order.
I wasn't, that's why I was asking you to define it. Thank you.
>grounded in the assumption that by making the exchange, both parties benefit.
And in a world filled with actors who don't give a hoot whether both parties benefit as long as their party benefits, how can you guarantee that assumption in any given exchange?