I posted previously about POTUS 11:11PM Tweet on 9/1 … a very clear 11:11 marker from POTUS we have all been waiting for >>4692763

At the time I said "Not sure what it means for now, but keep your eyes peeled over the next few days … Q things are habbening!"

Now 2 days later (11/1/19)… Q posts Q#2668

BOOM!

BOOM!

BOOM!

BOOM!

Q

The 2 days between POTUS 11:11 Tweet and Q's BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM post are very significant.

Remember when Q said they were "2 days" ahead of schedule in Q#2644. I think this was one of the points he was making.

Q#2668 is confirmation of POTUS 11:11 Marker Tweet (made on 9/1/19), and posted 2 days after the original marker Tweet was made.

Also note the 911 figures in the date (11/1/19) … As he has said about 911 .. Very significant .. for them!

Future proves past.

>>4708881

9 Jan 2019 = 9/1/2019 (thats how we write it here in Australia .. yeah I know we are Down Under and all) = 1/9/2019? US ?

11 Jan 2019 = 11/1/2019 (Aust date format) = 1/11/2019 ? US?

>>4708913

Thanks Baker Anon .. a small part of me was wondering if we might hear something on 11 Jan … seeing as 2 days after Trumps 11:11 Tweet Marker .. just wasnt game to say anything and jinx it !

>>4708934

Havent heard from her in a while on Twitter .. wonder if she comfy in Gitmo ?

>>4708953

We know that Q and Trump arent going to be too blatant in their messages atm .. hence all the crumbs, which we have to piece together … but as I said in >>4708827 Q posting BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM on 11 Jan 2019 (01/11/19 - did I get it correct for you US fags this time ?), 2 days after POTUS 11:11 Marker Tweet on 9 Jan 2019 (01/9/19) is pretty significant timing and proof. Will just have to watch and see what happens next.

>>4709019

Well hopefully Trumps actions we are seeing now will reduce the chance of SHTF in the future …

Just remember what DS/NWO want for the world to consolidate their control.

They wanted mass reduction in human population .. via a highly virulent and fatal disease or something similar .. now thats more your SHTF scenario right there.

>>4709038

You keep posting this yet missing the point every time.

Q said moon landings were real … but never said they were the ones allegedly made in the late 60s/70s.

>>4709065

You seem upset for some reason

>>4709095

welcome .. your shift just started?

you have some catching up to do if you want those fat binuses

>>4709181

I ran the inflation figures the other day (UK has figures dating back to 1750).

Inflation 1750 - 1850 (100 years) 80.8% (0.8% pa)

Inflation 1851 - 1931 (80 years) 82.4% (1.0% pa)

Inflation 1932 - 2017 (85 years) 435.6% (5.1% pa)

Pretty apparent when you look at it that way!

>>4709224

spacing of booms is 3/6/9 spaces .. apparently ties in with one of POTUS tweets

>>4709287

We have been mining gold for those little green fuckers for a long time,

Check out ancient mines in south africa .. remember someone saying they were digging down and came across these perfectly straight horizontal shafts … cut very precisely.

https://ancientexplorers.com/blogs/news/100-000-year-old-ruins-of-south-africa

gives you a brief rundown

>>4709289

Exactly right .. and I so wanted that 17th tweet from POTUS at 11:55:11PM on NYE.

>>4709345

The 4th kind is when Mummy and Daddy and Fido are loving each other very much ? .. then …..

>>4709372

Look out in the night sky … every twinkle is another sun with potential habitable planets .. you cant possibly think we are the only semi-intelligent form of life in the universe?

Read up some of David Wilocks's articles … give you a better picture of whats actually going on.