>>4709189 (LB)

>“Ninety percent of intelligence comes from open sources. The other 10 percent, the clandestine work, is just the more dramatic.

This is precisely the secret that the self-proclaimed geniuses at Langley have been hiding all these years to justify their need for $15 billion a year from the federal budget.

>>4709202

>"The real intelligence heroes are Anons, not James Bond" :))

Meanwhile, the President has to fight tooth & nail for $5 billion for border security.

Something does not compute here. Too many clowns in the equation.

>>4709513

OK, but what happens when deception is involved?

>>4709560

>there is zero tolerance for corruption.

Theoretically, that's what we have now, but practically we all know it's a different story, especially when we are exchanging with an entity that has far greater capital than us. For example, try fighting a corporation that has hired hundreds of people to defend against people who feel they've somehow been cheated in an exchange with a corporation.

>>4709908

That's what the article states, correct. I was quoting anon to make a point on the obscene amount of money that intelligence agencies spend when 90% of the work is very close to what is being done here at little to no cost.