>>4711853 pb from another thread

about ID of Sofa husband of Hussain

Parameters were like this:

Dude had to be an appointment by Hussain in his Admin?

So this is a mis-direction.

I've shown who it is many times but not many, if any, see it.

>>4711250 pb

I believe the "John" there in #709 refers to John P. Barlow who is said to have died on the 7th of February last year.

>>4711775 pb

No sauce other than "Of Course" which is not sauce.

Still haven't found fault with the chart which is way more specific than what this DISSenter outlines.

We have to make links between the Gross generalized outline and the actual world, and actual real specific names - not just family names, individual names.

Any given person in a specific family named, May Not Actually Be involved

We're still just looking at shadows on a Wall.

That's why I made a list of Foundations connected to all 3:

Killing of JFK

Creation of the CIA

and program for a New World Federation [ORDER]

And no one can even show who or WHAT is "P"

Not yet anyway.

Though I posted a reference in a 1952 article [see attached] which is from an ANON writer and published in "Contemporary Issues" #16 which is full of code and mentions "P" in a strange way.

It's written by an early colonizer of Israel. [see attachment]

>>4711096 pb

Definitely Trump-hate Propaganda, wouldn't you say? An un-named source [makes up shit] claim Kushner is "on the way out"

Dumb.

He's never out. He's a family member.

Phew. they are so hateful and desperate.

>>4712196

NOTABLE Baker

APNewsBreak: US approved thousands of child bride requests

>>4708257 pb Q question

What if SCOTUS nominee is female?

1. Multiplication of Attacks.

If one doesn't work there will be another and another and another

As we learned from Kavanaugh hearing It doesn't have to make sense or be logical. They push the emotion button.

1. Gang already have something in the works. We saw with Kavanaugh that Blazy had already prepared when his name was put on a list of possibilities. And there was another possible nominee who Blazy also prepared against.

Therefor they will have already prepared for the female nominee under consideration.

Perhaps for that reason POTUS will select a surprise female - Someone they couldn't have already had under FISA umbrella or under preparation to oppose?

With the umbrella you can bribe and threaten associates of the person you want to smear. No need for any accustions to be true.

We've already seen this

1. I don't know.

I wonder if the accusers will be another set of mind-control robots like "Balsy"?

>>4712270

>>4712279

^^^This has been true for a long time

>>4712326

^^^this

>>4712448

Good point, and all CAPS

Predictive Programming on the Simpsons?

>>4711874

Sauce doesn't match your contention.

I think it's authentic Confirmation Bias.

Right above it says "against Donald Trump"

WTF

>>4711916

And MANAFORT was what they used the FISA Umbrella for

There is a gap where the people who want to fram Pres DJT miss connecting POTUS to knowledge or involvement with anything Manafort did.

It's a big GAP.

I wonder why?

How far will they ride the insinuation train, when actual massive crimes and treason are ignored?