Anonymous ID: f639bf Jan. 11, 2019, 1:06 p.m. No.4714848   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4714611

>>4714585

>>4714585

 

>Seems to me it's a device to protect assets from possible seizure.

>

>I don't doubt the divorce will be legal - on paper.

>

>But a "uncoupling" in the true sense - I highly doubt it.

>

>The timing is sus as hell.

yeah, whatever it is, it aint normal. it dilutes bezos ownership of amazon. what the actual situation is, i have no idea. but, were i (((them))), i would certainly have fallback postitions in place. positions that could be taken in the event of catastrophe (Trump). one of those will certainly be attempts to maintain control of key assets. if bezos is severely comped and headed for whatever, then it might make sense to "uncouple" bezos from amazon. i would then push a more moderate line conceding all the broader progressive sjw bs, and hope thats good enough to maintain long-term control of the infrastrucure whether through bezos or some other (((thems))).

 

its more than just the cash and bezos personal assets, though im sure hed like that protected as well. but one of the main concerns has to be with maintaining control over amazon.