>>4715060 (lb), >>4715074 (lb) Lawfag on why ACB is not likely to be the SCOTUS nominee.

this dirty faggot has no idea what he is talking about and is just repeating some stupid horse shit he heard from some other cheap hustler who knows nothing about constitutional law.

> LINCOLN

a tyrant who violated the constitution at every turn. no precedent whatsoever for originalists. if you want a military dictatorship, then all good, go with lincoln, but it has nothing to do with constituional law.

> extreme catholic/evangeclical religious worship

fuck off atheist liberal shit bag. no establishment of religion. how clear is that?

> prolifers and evangelicals

normal, ever day, silent majority americans. kys.

> clause LIMITS CONGRESS POWER - NOT POTUS POWER

idiocy. president is subservient to congress, which is why congress can impeach president and why congress passes law. power not granted to congress is automatically not granted to president because president is inferior. if congress cannot pass law to do something then how can president, who has no power to make law, possible act in excess of laws passed by congress? complete fucking lunacy.

> BTW LINCOLN ignored it. So should we.

a dictator who declared war on his own country in violation of the constitution and every precedent and law.

> NEVER concede the power to suspend habeus to Congress

well, your own argument is that the constitution clearly states that congress has this power, along with all of their other law making powers, which the President does not have, so it just seems that you are talking shit here with no basis in fact or law whatsoever.

then you are trying to turn this nonsense faux argument into a neg on Amy in order to deceive people while also trying to "smear" her because she is a christian. not very convincing. fucking die liberal shill faggot.

by the way. the only thing you got right in your two posts was the second part of the "lawfag" description.