>>4721127 lb

Stalin was a nationalist.

He turned around and completely smashed the Bolshevik policies of pro-homosexuality and other degenerative nonsense. Then he counter-invaded Germany and actually made it to Berlin. That was not exactly part of the proverbial plan, which would have given most of Germany's tech and advances to the U.S.

Granted, much of the anti-Russian hysteria was drummed up by (((the media))). Not everyone who was anti-russian is pro cabal. It was just that the second world war never truly ended. One could even argue the first world war never truly ended, either, as many of the conflicts in China and Africa were direct extensions of World War 1 and carried over in the background to World War 2.

I think Russians were looking for a way out from under Communism for some time - and it wad just kind of the turning of the seasons when the Berlin Wall came down. But they still had their families and a large chunk of their culture. More than can be said for the west.

Honestly - I think the Russians got the better end of the deal compared to Europe, today… Although that's a very subjective measure that a number of Russians may scoff at.

>>4721224

I think people are getting wrapped up around the wrong things in regard to Ginsberg.

>>And so when Clinton, eager to please, entertained names proposed by women’s groups, he learned that some of them refused to support Ginsburg, because they were worried that she might be willing to overturn Roe (which is not what she had written, but one gathers that the Madison Lecture was more often invoked than read).

>> But the Air Force changed its policy and, in 1972, at the urging of then Solicitor General Erwin Griswold, the case was dismissed, a decision that had profound consequences: the following year, the Court ruled on Roe v. Wade instead, and struck down anti-abortion legislation not on the ground of equal protection but on the ground of a much weaker constitutional doctrine, the right to privacy.

>>If Struck was Ginsburg’s next, carefully placed stepping stone across a wide river, Roe was a rickety wooden plank thrown down across the water and—Ginsburg thought—likely to rot. In a lecture she delivered in 1984, she noted the political significance of the fact that the Court had treated sex discrimination as a matter of equal protection but reproductive autonomy as a matter of privacy. When the Court overturned laws on the basis of sex discrimination, no great controversy ensued, she observed, but Roe v. Wade remained “a storm center.” She went on, “Roe v. Wade sparked public opposition and academic criticism, in part, I believe, because the Court ventured too far in the change it ordered and presented an incomplete justification for its action.”

>>In 1971, Chief Justice Warren Burger, on hearing that Richard Nixon was considering nominating a woman to the Court, drafted a letter of resignation. “Feminist Picked for U.S. Court of Appeals Here,” the Washington Post announced in December of 1979, even before Carter had officially named Ginsburg to the D.C. Circuit.

>>De Hart describes Ginsburg’s thirteen years on the circuit court as something like a decontamination chamber, in which Ginsburg was rinsed and scrubbed of the hazard of her thirteen years as an advocate for women’s rights. By 1993, she had been sufficiently depolarized to be appointed to the Supreme Court.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/08/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-unlikely-path-to-the-supreme-court

This is why Ginsberg was selected - or a candidate for the reasons, she was very much a proponent of abortion and other issues, and cleverly arguing for them. She's a rabid feminist beneath the whitewashing. I'm copying too much pasta, here - but it's worth a read on her history and the snap decision by Clinton to appoint her to SCOTUS.

>>4721420

Imagine you start with a team. Each team starts with a torch lit from "torch prime." Their job and sole purpose in life, as passed down generation to generation, is to keep the torch alive so they can one day re-light that large torch.

But the plan goes a little awry. The teams are scattered early. Some betray the others and lock their torch away to enrich themselves and hunt down the others to secure a monopoly. Some are scattered to the point of fragments - children who were told to run with the torch by their parents' last breaths, with barely an understanding of what they had.

Don't blame them too much for being very edgy, hostile, and even very utilitarian in their approach. Many of them don't even know why they are carrying the torch, anymore - or that others even have a torch and that there was a team effort in the beginning.

Just because they have a torch doesn't mean they are any less lost than those who don't. But light in the dark draws both the curious and the nefarious.

It will be very hard to convince some of them that their mission is near completion and they are free from the duty of guarding the torch - all of humanity can carry it, now.

Of course, there are a few of them who have become very fat on monopolizing that torch… And it's high time their girth fueled the flame.

>>4721656

The fact that RvW is a huge news topic for… Whatever reason… And the fact that RBG was looking to "replace" RvW with more solid legal grounds for abortion… Seems odd to me.

Personally, I think abortion is more of a cultural issue than a legal one. It is a horrible sign of the times that women would rather kill their unborn children than bring them into the world. It is an issue that is mostly a symptom of something far, far worse and the fact that the democrats and "feminists" are portraying it as being a rights issue is simply evil.

I don't care to get involved in classifying abortion as murder or making it illegal and seeing women resort to coat hangers. Fix the underlying social issues and the abortion epidemic goes with it. Making abortion illegal gets into the can of worms of having every miscarriage investigated or people reporting each other the same way DFS is weaponized in subdivisions.

I think when it is exposed what is going on with the abortion racket and the media's efforts to turn men and women against each other to destroy the family - the whole abortion issue will largely evaporate with rabid feminism. Good men want to support women. Good women want to support men. The good always outnumber the bad.

>>4721737

Sounds like it is out of control.

My mother had a rather rare form of cancer. It didn't form standard lumps - it was an inflammatory cancer which was primarily lymphatic. There was no right to try at the time. She fought it for quite a few years before she died.

>>4721814

Assuming any of the reports about her are halfway true - it's in her pancreas, colonc lung… Probably bones…

They must have her wired up with some good animatronics….