>>4722326

Then you had better be sure your wife never has a miscarriage, anon. Try dealing with that, then having your nosy neighbor report you for suspected murder.

You try to make this simple, but you are doing exactly what I accused you of - missing the trees for the forest.

>>4722344

The declaration of independence is not law. Period. End of story. Try making a legal case based on it, and see how that goes.

You do not have a right to life.

Extrapolate a right to life. If you are starving and I decline giving you access to my food - am I killing you? Is the government responsible for the rights it grants? If a government fails to provide you with "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" - then what?

Think logically.

If I can accuse you of murder for having a miscarriage, can I also accuse you of child abuse for suggesting your child's gender?

There are certain things which exist within the domain of parents. The bond between parent and child is a sacred relationship.

Claims you are protecting it while perpetually inserting the state between it is delusional. On both sides of this.

And my IP just cycled for whatever reason…. Yay for net mysteries.

>>4722598

The miscarriage is, itself, evidence.

Drugs exist that can induce miscarriages. If abortion is murder - then deliberately taking herbal supplements to induce an abortion is murder.

If there is a right to life, then the child belongs to the state. The parents are simply the stewards of the state's ownership of that child. Therefor, miscarriages found to be due to negligence constitute manslaughter.

This isn't a difficult road to follow. See Mueller's investigation. "Probable cause" is investigated for a crime. The probable cause is the miscarriage. Otherwise, all one needs to do to sidestep anti-abortion laws is to claim a miscarriage. If the laws are not enforced, then you have lawlessness.

Choose carefully what laws are worth killing people over. Behind every parking ticket is a gun. You do not get to dispute the parking ticket. You get to settle a contempt of court charge before it is levied at you. You don't get to dispute the contempt of court charge - you get to settle it with a fine or jail time before being placed under arrest. The only way to dispute arrest in progress is with force - and the police are not going to stop their application of force just because you defeated the attempt at it. You had better be willing to kill the whole of the government or have a deal with the people who run no-go zones to let you live there, and then you live under whatever laws they have.

Laws are a sacred thing, anon. You can't simply toss them about at things you do not like. The consequences and ramifications of each one need to be carefully considered.