re:Project Blue Book pb notable
ep 101
Watched the original…should be interesting
>https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/13/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22oath%22%5D%7D&r=3&s=1
This guy should stop reporting now
Early on in video
"Terroist attack!" - drama
Naked People
Naked People
Glass
Major Explosion - Drama
Blood
Q posted "2 days ahead of schedule"
Jan 12 2019 - Jan 14 2018 = 363 days 2 day offset from 1 year
Q 538
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.23 📁
Jan 14 2018 15:18:16 (EST)
BEWARE of MAJOR FALSE FLAG attempts this week.
KNOW your surroundings.
CHANGE OF NEWS CYCLE WILL BE NEEDED.
ABILITY to ATTACK LIMITED>[ISIS on LIFE SUPPORT]
Tactics shift to threats and hostages to obtain rogue_ops.
SILENCE [187] - no risk [no capture - dead on arrival].
SILENCE [LV]?
SILENCE [LV witnesses]?
SILENCE [LV-FBI]?
SILENCE WILL NOT LAST FOREVER.
TRUST.
Q
0 posts on Jan 12 2018
They are not legal
You need a visit from the FBI
18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
(Production of child pornography)
18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
(Possession, distribution and receipt of child pornography)
18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States
Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.
Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.
>Just know that things posted on this board have power to change things IRL
Good to go
FULLY aware of that, watched it happen many times now.
Is why I try to be cautious.
Should respond to her twat, "Zip it Freddy"
>https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/msm-is-getting-weirder-more-frantic-and-more-desperate-by-the-day-3b220ea0bb97
Just wait…it gunna get real guud when RBG is announced