Look at POTUS Tweet Data for 10 Jan 2019 - Lots of 1111 in the tweet data (as shown) highlighting the significance of the 11:11 Marker in his 11:11PM Tweet on 9 Jan and interestingly a lot of 41/14's in the data as well.

As you recall the Tweet time was 11:11:41PM - I didnt think any significance of the 41 at that time, but now wondering if POTUS was pointing towards GWB through the 41 sign?

I have seen some comments in the past couple of days suggesting both "No Name" and GWB (41) did not die of natural causes - but were found guilty and executed - so wondering if this is the significance of 41 in the 11:11 Tweet Marker?

>>4722974

I get what u are trying to say .. but theres no FUC or D cards in normal deck either .. so absence of Q card doesnt seem overly significant … would you have prefererred he spelt it FUQD?

>>4722983

Thanks for the correction.

Sorry I mixed them up … not US fag .. but I knew who i was talking about .. kek

>>4722967

Cant wait till u sick fuck get whats coming to you …

>>4722998

Its all good brother, I just didnt understand the logic you were applying there .. I am the same when it comes to POTUS Tweets .. see significant numbers all over the place. Hard to unsee once you have had your eyes opened.

>>4722998

btw I did see QE (17/5) over the past few weeks in the tweet numbers posted each day, so you may be onto something.

Any other significant numbers I should be looking out for in data that could be significant to what you talking about ??

>>4723038

The 11:11 PM Tweet Marker by POTUS on 9 Jan was very significant .. keep seeing numbers and times all adding to 11 in tweet contents, times and graphics.

Also was backed up by Q with his Boom Boom Boom Boom post on 11 Jan, 2 days after (also explains why he said they "2 days ahead" of schedule)

>>4723058

>>4723058

>>4723058

Youre the only cunt here spamming the board with this shite .. so fuck off already

>>4723209

>https://twitter.com/CodesUcq

May also need to factor in daylight savings +1hr to NZ time.