>>4723719

I dont agree with this wacko hambeast in the slightest. Anons could still learn something from this interaction.

1. Am I under arrest?

>No.

1. Then this conversation is over. Give me your contact info, and I'll have my lawyer call you.

They can investigate all they want, but people are going to speak their minds, regardless. Is it stupid to make threats against any US president? Yep. Is it illegal to say "someone ought to…"? No. Is it illegal to make a DIRECT threat? Yes. Important distinction.

Again, fuck her, and the caravan she rode in on. It's the USSS job to investigate dummies being dummies. Like another anon said:

>>4723925

>>4724073

>I hope there is some statute within military law that will allow his crimes to be adjudicated by military tribunal. The worm.

Read the last paragraph, anon:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states/?utm_source=link&utm_medium=header