Anonymous ID: 1fe4f5 Jan. 12, 2019, 9:21 a.m. No.4725991   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4725902 lb

I'm not convinced this is it. The antenna appears (to me anyway) to have the wrong geometry for such a device. Also, it is Samsung branded and large companies like this don't tend to put a booster in a battery without shouting it from the rooftops (unless it is an intentional exploit.)

Anonymous ID: 1fe4f5 Jan. 12, 2019, 9:41 a.m. No.4726213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6418

Samsung Battery Mystery Solved - most likely.

 

Few Samsung batteries have 7 lines of text, so I'm pretty sure this is the one.

 

Note the 'features' in pic 2. This appears to be an NFC antenna that is openly advertised by the battery mfg. (Which is usually 3rd party Chinese crap.)

 

So the big questions for anyone who knows anything about Samsung (or other phones) and NFC – These batteries have 4 connections. Is NFC communication part of the specifications for these? Is there an above board abuse of the battery standards that enables NFC communications that is accepted in the industry?

 

NFC operates at 13.56 MHz. Pic 3 is an NFC antenna from a different source.

 

I'm pretty convinced this is just an asshat who thinks his NFC antenna was being used by the FBI to access his illegal shit.

 

That being said, these extra antennas are actually rather scary. God only knows what the phones are doing.

 

Also, special note for those who don't know (because most don't): EVERY cell phone has at least two CPUs. The radio chips for cell phones run their own operating system and are exploitable. So no matter what you're doing in the other part of the phone, an exploit to the radio chip (which there are many) can ruin your day, so to speak.

 

I'm VERY careful with the very old phone I have and very aware of just how dangerous these fucking things are.

Anonymous ID: 1fe4f5 Jan. 12, 2019, 9:53 a.m. No.4726355   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4726261

Yes, I have dug. You're spreading C_A misinformation because you're a fucking douche. Some of us know what's actual reality without all the spoopy ET smuggled in. It is just electronics, dipshit.

 

>>4726286

Yeah, well, I'm not going to disclose how these things work because I don't need the headache. However, I do think we'll be seeing some nifty flying vehicles in the future.

 

And your post wreaks of C_A disinformation artist. Haven't you guys noticed that we've figured out how you operate? Protip: It doesn't work anymore. The sheep know your tricks. Polish off your resume because you'll be flipping burgers soon (or scratching hashmarks into a cell wall every day.)

Anonymous ID: 1fe4f5 Jan. 12, 2019, 9:58 a.m. No.4726413   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4726391

>Since enoch refuses to put it in the notables, I'll just keep reposting with updated numbers.

Do you have screecaps of the original bar graphs? If so, wait until we totally kill the poll and then cap the before/after.

 

I think it would make notable because it is a great demonstration of how much leverage we have here. This is the Q HAMMER.