>>4725209 pb
>>4725227 pb
>Sounds like the guy who rants here from time to time about disclosure
Could it be coded message to/from spook?
The grammar, misspellings, non-sensical sentence structure, pseudo-ebonics … trying too hard (to sound stupid) to be believable
complice - archaic form of accomplice >complice.co >>accomplice.co ??
(pic related) some of the spoopiest pics from complice.co (pepe is not theirs)
I'm not suggesting anyone waste a brain cell on this, just hate when people say one thing and mean another, while celebrating your ignorance of the true message right in front of your face … am I right?
… and why the hell are they 'minding the bees' and 'eating the frogs'? – that's NOT RIGHT and downright offensive!