>>4728243 (lb)
It’s not about the bewbs in and of itself per se (I for one luvz them)
Even my often childish self knows this.
If they censored bewbs, that would be just the first of many “adjustments” dumfugs would argue for.
Plus the idea for using sexy women to get soldiers to pay attention is tried, true and tested.
(pic related)
Well I’m glad you made your point.
That’s the point right?
If not then what’s the point?
My point is that I look at it a different way.
Kek
I remember a time when nudes were spoilered. I also remember the “war of the bewbs”
Q (et al) started on half true, and got unceremoniously run off truth be told.
4 breddy’s in a row of tranny porn I member hearing about etc.
The “Point” is, and I’ve watched the debate, is bewbs are here to stay. I see alot of stuff on here I’d rather not see. Femfags and prudes bitchin about bewbs is gay.
To your “point” Q has also never said to get rid of the bewbs either and they could.