Anonymous ID: 0775fd Jan. 12, 2019, 2:07 p.m. No.4729192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4729172

>Are they seriously trying to blame the government shutdown for the change in the earth's magnetic poles?

no, that would probably be a level of stupid beyond even (((them))).

they will blame him for anything bad that can conceivably be connected to it though.

Anonymous ID: 0775fd Jan. 12, 2019, 2:14 p.m. No.4729258   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4729203

>Q

>

>Wray is deep state op.

 

maybe so, maybe not. there are two types of people i trust. those who i know from experience (or trusted testimony) to be of good character. and those over whom i hold leverage. no proof one way or another with wray, but i have my suspicions.

pic relevant.

Anonymous ID: 0775fd Jan. 12, 2019, 2:22 p.m. No.4729318   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9383

>>4729283

>We see the pattern within Jewish culture and behavior. It is a very manipulative pattern like what you are attempting (unsuccessfully) right now.

>

>And you dare insist we must love you as individuals? Ok, as individuals you are shit

 

read some basic economics and then try again. this whole fucking line of reasoning is basically an exercise in determining how many fucking unique ways can be found to commit the fallacy of composition.

Anonymous ID: 0775fd Jan. 12, 2019, 2:31 p.m. No.4729413   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4729313

>Allowing any other attribute only creates a situation where people have to argue about the importance level of each attribute, which, in itself, opens up the whole system to corruption. Without this distinction, then everything relevant is decided through the system.

 

if it is a system then it can be modeled. if it can be modeled then, at first glance, i am inclined to think that it is not possible to have every relevant decision determined only through the system and have all the determinations turn out to be correct. perhaps they dont all need to be correct.

part of the problem here is with quantification and our inability to find a scheme that is materially better than the theory of types.

am all for some type of merit based system that determines political influence as long as it isnt money based. not sure how realistic that is though given the general state of the population.

Anonymous ID: 0775fd Jan. 12, 2019, 2:38 p.m. No.4729476   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4729383

>When they start nailing you morons to crosses I will cry for you.

why the fuck would that happen. read the fucking post again. i have no issues with any individual based purely on their racial history. i do have issues with classes of people (potentially identifiable as stemming from a particular race) that fuck with me and mine.

i also have issues with fuckwits that cant even figure out the fallacy of composition.

we probably agree on quite a bit. but how conclusions get drawn is often more important than the actual conclusions themselves. why? because defending a poorly drawn conclusion however correct it might be is a recipe for fucking defeat.

Anonymous ID: 0775fd Jan. 12, 2019, 3:13 p.m. No.4729812   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9838

>>4729772

>Capitalism is gay because it puts the pursuit of the dollar over everything else.

 

agree that what we call capitalism in the states today is gay. but its also fake.

the wealth of nations was preceded by, and requires the theory of moral sentiments. that theory does NOT recommend the pursuit of profit as an acceptable method for living a good life.