>>4729065 (lb)

The other anon correctly pointed out what you're doing when you chose to use sweeping gross generalizations and loaded terminolgy. As to denigrate, as my other post clarified, iPad pieces of shit change more than I type. I can't catch them all in time, but you obviously caught the original intent.

If you actually bought the fallacious logic you're eschewing, you wouldn't have suggested to define the term JQ in the first place. Own up to your biases. They are what they are. Perhaps you'll learn they're misguided over time, but understand why you're triggered. It's because you're uncomfortable with your own beliefs.