Anonymous ID: a3dae1 Jan. 12, 2019, 2:17 p.m. No.4729276   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9313

>>4729195

Interesting anon, might start doing the date tip.

 

>>4729253

>No other attribute should be important

I don't know if I would go that far.

Everything that can be quantified is important.

Even gender.

 

But giving people more voting power if they are better at voting 'correctly' triggered could at least be a first step.

Anonymous ID: a3dae1 Jan. 12, 2019, 2:32 p.m. No.4729421   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9449

>>4729343

Very interesting ideas.

Is relying on technology the right way forward?

Or.. the only way forward.

 

Technology allows us to escape the cycles that [they] put us in?

Double edged sword though.

 

I'll dig for the PDF, have good search-fu so might be able to.

But yeah, it is a topic for later. I'll keep it in mind though.

 

>>4729313

Innate morality is genetic and gender dependent.

Anonymous ID: a3dae1 Jan. 12, 2019, 3:16 p.m. No.4729838   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4729812

Morals can be subverted/bypassed through ignorance or brainwashing

I'm not calling for anything other than the complete destruction of the way things are currently done or have ever been done before.

All ideas should be tested against a standard.

If it is beneficial for progress and health and beauty, etc, then it can proceed, otherwise it should be eliminated.