>>4729054

Ty baker!

Reposting below bc was late in bread lb:

Any anons agree with me that the guide for newfags should NOT be included in global notables?

Part of why the learning curve to posting to the chans is good is so that newfags have to lurk some before posting, and put effort in to learning the logistics to screen out ppl that just want to spout opinions but not work. This is a work site, not a chat room, but it often devolves to the latter. Not sure it benefits us to tip the scales in that direction even further.

Not the end of the world if it stays in, just wanted to present the other side of the argument.

>>4729250

Telling children they need to eat their dinner before dessert doesn't always "go over well" either. We need to start making societal decisions based on practical wisdom, not feels, informed by facts of human nature, not the muh equality bullshit of Marxist mob rule.

Human nature functions best in family units with the man as head of house. The family gets a vote, represented by the man. Just as the county gets a vote represented by the congressman. Feminism was a false bill of goods and has been a major element in our degradation as a society. But it couldn't be pulled off by our (((enemy))) w/o setting the stage first:

1) erode the churches/moral leadership and government leadership,

2) erode the economy/property/trade power of individual men,

3) above creates men that are emasculated, stressed, and absent leadership/guidance,

4) tell women, "See? Bad Man Bad!" which leads to "You don't need no stinking man,

5) Create social programs that forcibly redistribute the work product of men to women & welfare recipients,

6) Tell these same that they have equal voting rights to increase their share of others' wealth as the stakeholders/creators of that wealth

It's no more women's fault than any others of us that yields to the successive temptations/stresses that the planned destruction of our societies led us through like rats in a maze. Doesn't change the fact women being given the vote was a key element in allowing the emotional manipulators to more easily manipulate us into a short-sighted participation in our own demise as a people.

>>4729316

Do you have any reasoning for your position or specific rebuttal to mine? The position isn't only mine, btw, I've seen it argued many times by oldfags, which is why I thought it should be represented in the debate. Just curious what someone's counter-argument would be to these points.

>>4729498

How is this dividing by sex? The post was a reasoned argument to counter the actual dividing of the sexes accomplished by Feminism. Putting out historical facts and logical explanations based on the brutal realism of human nature isn't dividing anyone from anything but harmful delusions put in our heads by those that wish to weaken us as a people. Feminism did NOT create unity between men and women, quite the opposite. There are quite a few gender-female patriots that agree with this analysis.

>>4729629

It is only very recently in our history that universal suffrage even became a thing, and since it did, we went to hell in a handbasket. Your argument that personhood = thinking = vote is all part of Marxism which is largely based on lies/delusion.

Not all persons can think, or think equally well. This is demonstrated on IQ bell curve distributions. Regardless of their ability to think or not think, not all persons should vote as part of a universal suffrage democracy. There are many ways to run society and to organize government. Ours was never meant to be a democracy but a republic. My argument is that it functioned better when it was a republic, that the people that switched it into a democracy can also be shown to be bad actors that did it to enrich themselves at our expense, therefore we ought to consider reinstituting the system that worked. Your rebuttal was a strawman that I was saying women were neither persons or thinking persons, when I said neither, and believe neither.

>>4729733

Again, this does not address my argument, but continues to argue on the false assumption that I'm saying "all women can't think as well as men." We're here to fight the powers that enslaved us. Part of how they did it was getting us to think selfishless and short-sightedly from a position of pride and envy, so that we don't play our part to sacrifice for the greater good.