Anonymous ID: 56aaca Jan. 12, 2019, 4:42 p.m. No.4730811   🗄️.is 🔗kun

So RGB thinks the age of consent should be 12? Why is the US Government permitting these people to come in on visas? The end of the article says "… the data show some 4,749 minor spouses or fiancees received green cards to live in the U.S. over that 10-year period." Read this about some real-life child brides:

 

https://apnews.com/19e43295c76d4d249aa51c9f643eb377

 

Requests to bring in child brides OK’d; legal under US laws

By COLLEEN LONG

January 12, 2019

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Thousands of requests by men to bring in child and adolescent brides to live in the United States were approved over the past decade, according to government data obtained by The Associated Press. In one case, a 49-year-old man applied for admission for a 15-year-old girl.

 

The approvals are legal: The Immigration and Nationality Act does not set minimum age requirements for the person making the request or for that person’s spouse or fiancee. By contrast, to bring in a parent from overseas, a petitioner has to be at least 21 years old.

 

And in weighing petitions, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services goes by whether the marriage is legal in the spouse or fiancee’s home country and then whether the marriage would be legal in the state where the petitioner lives.

 

The data raises questions about whether the immigration system may be enabling forced marriage and about how U.S. laws may be compounding the problem despite efforts to limit child and forced marriage. Marriage between adults and minors is not uncommon in the U.S., and most states allow children to marry with some restrictions.

 

There were more than 5,000 cases of adults petitioning on behalf of minors and nearly 3,000 examples of minors seeking to bring in older spouses or fiances, according to the data requested by the Senate Homeland Security Committee in 2017 and compiled into a report. The approval is the first of a two-step visa process, and USCIS said it has taken steps to better flag and vet the petitions.

 

Some victims of forced marriage say the lure of a U.S. passport combined with lax U.S. marriage laws are partly fueling the petitions.

 

“My sunshine was snatched from my life,” said Naila Amin, a dual citizen born in Pakistan who grew up in New York City.

 

She was forcibly married at 13 in Pakistan and later applied for papers for her 26-year-old husband to come to the U.S. at the behest of her family. She was forced for a time to live in Pakistan with him, where, she said, she was sexually assaulted and beaten. She came back to the U.S., and he was to follow.

 

“People die to come to America,” she said. “I was a passport to him. They all wanted him here, and that was the way to do it.”

 

Amin, now 29, said she was betrothed when she was just 8 and he was 21. The petition she submitted after her marriage was approved by immigration officials, but he never came to the country, in part because she ran away from home. She said the ordeal cost her a childhood. She was in and out of foster care and group homes, and it took a while to get her life on track.

 

“I was a child. I want to know: Why weren’t any red flags raised? Whoever was processing this application, they don’t look at it? They don’t think?” Amin asked.

 

Fraidy Reiss, who campaigns against coerced marriage as head of a group called Unchained at Last, has scores of similar anecdotes: An underage girl was brought to the U.S. as part of an arranged marriage and eventually was dropped at the airport and left there after she miscarried. Another was married at 16 overseas and was forced to bring an abusive husband.

 

Reiss said immigration status is often held over their heads as a tool to keep them in line.

 

There is a two-step process for obtaining U.S. immigration visas and green cards. Petitions are first considered by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS. If granted, they must be approved by the State Department. Overall, there were 3.5 million petitions received from budget years 2007 through 2017.

 

Over that period, there were 5,556 approvals for those seeking to bring minor spouses or fiancees, and 2,926 approvals by minors seeking to bring in older spouses, according to the data. Additionally, there were 204 for minors by minors. Petitions can be filed by U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

 

“It indicates a problem. It indicates a loophole that we need to close,” Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, told the AP.

 

[Moar at website]

Anonymous ID: 56aaca Jan. 12, 2019, 5:02 p.m. No.4731048   🗄️.is 🔗kun

So much for free speech? World-reknowned Nobel scientist stripped of honors AGAIN due to his opinion on intelligence by a private lab supported by federal funds (National Cancer Institute Cancer Center)!!! [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_Spring_Harbor_Laboratory ]

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/news/articles/2019-01-11/lab-revokes-honors-for-controversial-dna-scientist-watson

 

Lab Revokes Honors for Controversial DNA Scientist Watson

 

Research lab revokes honorary titles for Nobel Prize-winning DNA scientist James Watson, who lost his job there in 2007 for expressing racist views.

 

Jan. 11, 2019, at 5:43 p.m.

By MALCOLM RITTER, AP Science Writer

 

NEW YORK (AP) — James Watson, the Nobel Prize-winning DNA scientist who lost his job in 2007 for expressing racist views, was stripped of several honorary titles Friday by the New York lab he once headed.

 

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory said it was reacting to Watson's remarks in a television documentary aired earlier this month.

 

In the film, Watson said his views about intelligence and race had not changed since 2007, when he told a magazine that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours — where all the testing says not really."

 

In the 2007 interview, Watson said that while he hopes everyone is equal, "people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true."

 

In this month's documentary, he said genes cause a difference on average between blacks and whites on IQ tests.

 

The laboratory, calling the latest remarks "reprehensible" and "unsupported by science," said they effectively reversed Watson's 2007 written apology and retraction. It said it had revoked three honorary titles, including chancellor emeritus and honorary trustee.

 

Watson had long been associated with the lab, becoming its director in 1968, its president in 1994 and its chancellor 10 years later. A school at the lab is named after him.

 

Watson's son Rufus said Friday in a telephone interview that his father, who's 90, was in a nursing home following an October car crash, and that his awareness of his surroundings is "very minimal."

 

"My dad's statements might make him out to be a bigot and discriminatory," he said, but that's not true. "They just represent his rather narrow interpretation of genetic destiny."

 

"My dad had made the lab his life, and yet now the lab considers him a liability," he said.

 

James Watson shared a 1962 Nobel Prize with collaborator Francis Crick and scientist Maurice Wilkins for discovering in 1953 that DNA was a double helix, shaped like a long, gently twisting ladder. The breakthrough was key to determining how genetic material works.

 

The double helix became a widely recognized symbol of science, and Watson himself became famous far beyond scientific circles.