>>4733502 (lb)

Why you Anons seem to avoid this post >>4733066 (lb) Thats basically what its talking about.

Forgive me my way of writing pls but it feels like, no matter from what direction you go for the "map", you will hit a WALL at one point. If you dig clock, dates, time stamps, trump twitter connections, [blabla] markers, (blabla) markers. No matter! At one point its just a wall and you have to GO BACK again. It tastes like "We dont have the very basic fundamentals of the Q communication".

Thats why its maybe not a bad idea to start categorizing EVERY SINGLE BIT.

I, for the first time since the begining, finally see something that one day could become something like a "pattern" or "sequenze" like Q suggested. The "type 2 codes" (named for better orientation) and "Be __" codes alone somehow paint a little picture. Not even kidding.

Sharing again because days of digging code.

https://pastebin.com/raw/XD27uP0q