Anonymous ID: f5571a Jan. 13, 2019, 12:07 p.m. No.4740709   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0734 >>0766 >>0778

>>4739990 (lb I think)

 

Anons, newfag/exMil fag here. NOT lawfag, but have an idea on the 2/3s Senate thing.

 

  • Under current rules (I think), need 2/3s supermajority of "duly chosen and sworn" senators EXCEPT for Senate rule changes, which only needs 2/3s of "present and voting Senators. So….

 

  • Drop the HAMMER and arrest cabal / criminal / traitor Senators. Then

 

  • Good Senators VOTE (present and voting) to change the rule to expel bad Senators from 2/3s DULY CHOSEN AND SWORN to 2/3s PRESENT AND VOTING. (i.e., re-define supermajority). Bad arrested Senators cut out of the vote to expel them.

 

  • 2/3s of remaining (GOOD) Senators vote to exel the arrested BAD Senators who are present to vote (as they are in GITMO / Prison / etc.

 

Thoughts?

 

Sauce: https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/1986/how-many-votes-is-a-senate-supermajority-when-there-are-vacancies

Anonymous ID: f5571a Jan. 13, 2019, 12:08 p.m. No.4740734   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0752

>>4740709

>arrested BAD Senators who are present to vote (as they are in GITMO / Prison / etc.

 

…NOT arrested BAD Senators who are present to vote (as they are in GITMO / Prison / etc. (apology for typo)