>>4740608 lb lb lb
>this truth
is NOT about abortion
its about the rigged system that gets money from us and gives it to corrupt pols
THAT is the point of this post anons
there are many many others
Q just users PP cuz the rabid pro lifers lap it up
some faggot posted this from the Q R. Board welcome message: As for the JQ, if you think we're all anti-semites, research our claims of jewish supremacy in media/gov./finance/entertainment before weighing in. How else do you think we came to our ideas? Do you think Q would choose a collection of idiots who have an ideology of hating people for no reason?
The gist of the post was Q has somehow endorsed the JQ and the prevailing attitude of BO, BV's and many /pol and 8chan vets - yes we all know their position and they have endorsed and adopted the concept that Jews and Judaism are evil. And since Q "chose" to post here Q therefore also supports this position
Not at all - Q chose this Board for a reason all right - but not that one - this is the same as proposing Q came here for the bewbs, or Q came here cuz 8chan has anime and robooty porn - no one claims that - so how and why does this so called JQ get a pass? Cuz the above noted group says so thats why - and they are dead wrong.
There is an obvious reason Q chose this forum - there were NO OTHER OPTIONS to inform and create a digital army - what other options are there? Start his own website or forum? Cant do that - cant use govt money and would have to conceal ownership and ops of the site which is trouble and risk - not to mention the fact that it would start with ZERO base or usage. NO not an option.
How about existing forums and media? Youtube, FB. Twitter, Instagram, Redditt? NOT an option - we all know what happens when anons post THE PLAN and POR POTUS sutff there - censored - not to mention NONE of those are setup as an image board - these being a critical part of the Q crumbs - which also rules out GAB and VOAT (assuming no censorship there?)
NO - 8chan is the ONLY forum that has robust imaging, zero censorship, and a large and savvy digital user base. That is why it was chosen and why is succeeded. And in fact the JQ and all the other less important shilling was a Q team bonus - used for training aids to tell truth from fiction - after all has Q ever endorsed or supported the prevailing view here on Jews? Well there were a few that were on topic - Q post 998 which posted the jew meme with the knife is exactly in context here - an anon posted that meme and asks this question "Tell us, Q. How many are connected to (((roths)))"
And Q answers = the chair serves the master = jews serve the master
It was also posted in the middle of the revelations about the Vatican - and anti-semitism is a long standing tradition in the Catholic church.
There was also several posts on MOSSAD - but that cannot eb conflated with Jews, Israel or Judaism any more than saying CIA is American means all americans are evil. Finally the BIGGEST crumb was "Saving Israel for last - very specific reason." OK great - what does it mean? NO anon has decoded this - Sure lots of "reasons" (accusations) get posted but NONE has ever been a "VERY SPECIFIC REASON." NONE. EVER.
That said I do agree there IS INDEED A JQ - in fact there are two - the first s the Q post - WHAT IS THE VERY SPECIFIC REASON ISRAEL IS SAVED FOR LAST?" I have seen NO analysis or discussion of that VERY SPECIFIC crumb.
VERY = in a high degree - Extremely, exceedingly, exceptionally, especially, tremendously, immensely
SPECIFIC = particular, specified, certain, fixed, set, determined, distinct, separate, definite, single, individual, peculiar, discrete, express, precise (IE NOT GENERAL)
REASON = a basis or cause for some belief, action, fact or event
OK? so we are looking for "an extremely definite, discrete and precise basis for "saving Israel for last."" Any anon want to claim an answer or decode that fits these plain english words in the Q crumb? Havnt seen anything close.
1/2
2/2
JQ #2 - is the one from 40,000 feet - and that is "WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE JEW IN HUMAN HISTORY?" I will say there has been some high quality posting on this question - but it is drowned out by the false "Jews are evil" narrative shitposts. We all know the Jews have a disporportionate role in human history - OK some say all evil - of course that is so obviously wrong it has zero credibility even on this board. There are many ideas and theories - christian, muslim, secular and non-secular, historical, social, religious, financial, demographic, geographic and on and on - every aspect of human history. It is phenomenal indeed and warrants full analysis in any discussion of human histroy and where we are headed - which after all is the subject of the Q posts and the GA. Specifically "What role do the Jews have in the GA?" is the critical included question. By all means discuss, criticize and post away but if we stay intellectually honest and on target we will get there sooner and with much less suffering. The posts that pass for "discussion" of the JQ here is 90% simplistic garbage, insults, ethnic slurs, divisionfag shitposts, projections, misleading accusations and fake history, and outright falsehoods - that should tell all truth seekers just how important the JQ really is. Who is hiding the truth and preventing real consideration of the JQ? Those who claim to be exposing Jewish evil, thats who.
GOD DEFINES THE BEGINNING OF LIFE AND ENTRY OF THE SOUL INTO A NEWBORN
Genesis 2:7 King James Version (KJV)
7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
GOD COMMANDS ABORTION OF AN ADULTEROUS FETUS:
Numbers 5:11-22 King James Version (KJV)
11 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,
12 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside, and commit a trespass against him,
13 And a man lie with her carnally, and it be hid from the eyes of her husband, and be kept close, and she be defiled…
21 Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The Lord make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the Lord doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;
22 And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen.
GOD DECREESS THE PENALTY FOR CAUSING MISCARRAIGE - FINE ONLY AS JUDGE/HUSBAND DETERMINE - NOT MURDER
Exodus 21:22 King James Version (KJV)
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
NOTE - pro -lifers cite this very same scripture for the opposite position - most scholars support the traditional and long established conclusion noted above - however, some do argue aganst this - their conclusions are questions - but see this article for full discussion:
https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1992/09/the-fetus-in-biblical-law
JESUS DID NOT ALTER THESE LAWS (THOUGH SOME - KOSHER LAWS AND SACRIFICE WERE MADE OBSOLETE BY JESUS)
Matthew 5:17 King James Version (KJV)
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Here is a link to an essay why the Bible does not prohibut abortion: http://www.prochoiceactionnetwork-canada.org/articles/bible.shtml
OK so now here are Pro lifers arguments for their position - rebuttal
Fetus are called "babies" in scripture:
“The babies jostled each other within her.” (Genesis 25:22)
Sorry but this is just a misleading translation - in Hebrew the word "baby" comes from the root word that means "nursing." Furthermore this verse symbolizes (or prophecizes) the future conflict between the two lines of Isaac (hebrew) and Esau (arab) resulting from the battle over Isaac's birthrights. it is not intended to be read literally.
And here - "As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy.(Luke 1:41) - Again this is clearly not intended to be read literally - the "baby" (translation misleading) did not leap - it is just a honor and manner of saying that your child (Mary) will be greater than mine (Elizabeth) And that was certainly true.
However, the most quoted scripture in support of the the pro life position is Jeremiah, which refers to God knowing and honoring the fruits of his mother's womb:
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart.” (Jeremiah 1:5)
Of course this says nothing at all about when life begins or abortion - it only makes clear that God knew the future and fate of that Prophet BEFORE he even was formed in the womb - not after.
And this Psalm:
For You created my inmost being; You knit me together in my mother’s womb…Your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in Your book before one of them came to be. (Psalm 139:13,16) Again this only states that Gos knows all and creates all - it says nothing about when life begins or abortion.
Same case for these scriptures:
This is what the Lord says—He who made you, who formed you in the womb. (Isaiah 44:2)
“Did not He who made me in the womb make them? Did not the same One form us both within our mothers?” (Job 31:15)
And of course the Ten Commandments - "thous shall not murder" is the correct translation but pro- lifers say "Thou shalt not kill" = clearly wrong since killing is condoned in the bible in war, for pusnishment, in self defense etc and is NOT murder.
BOTTOM LINE FOR PRO LIFERS AS STATED BY THE CHURCH - READ CAREFULLY:
Full Question
My friend contends that the Bible can't be used to argue against abortion because nowhere in the Bible does it state that abortion is wrong and that life begins at conception. How do I respond?
Answer
Though we don’t find the word abortion mentioned in any biblical text, we can deduce from Scripture, not to mention natural law, reason, Church teaching, and patristic witness that abortion is intrinsically evil.
TRANSLATION - TRUST THE CHURCH FATHERS WHO CAN "DEDUCE" THAT ABORTION IS EVIL
you not woke