>Current AF-1 does not but the new one in 2020 will be able the refuel in the air.
I thought it was the other way around anon - current CAN refuel mid-air, new ones coming, cannot?
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a28402/white-house-instructed-air-force-aerial-refueling-air-force-one/
>Anytime i watch that i always follow up with this.
>
>BIZARRE Appearance of Military Behind Trump during speech.
And they stand there for, near as I can make out, 45 seconds.
>
>1min 11secs
>Considering the new presidential transports will not be completed for years, it is not yet clear whether they will be able to take on fuel during flight or not.
>Maybe this means that by the time the plane is finished, there will by a new kind of fuel that would eliminate the need for mid-air refueling.
>>>4743179 (You)
>
>Considering the new presidential transports will not be completed for years, it is not yet clear whether they will be able to take on fuel during flight or not.
>
>Maybe this means that by the time the plane is finished, there will by a new kind of fuel that would eliminate the need for mid-air refueling.
That did cross my mind, anon.
I think in the article, they say it may change and were speculating congress or similar (can't remember exactly) could force in-air refuelling capability if they felt it necessary for security reasons.
>>>4743211 (You)
>
>you will like this one too (sorry I know I posted last bread, but it's that good).
>
>Best advice from our Commander In Chief.
No apology needed, anon. Enjoyed that one too (have seen once before, but had forgotten about it).
Looking forward to the next rallies.