Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 1:48 a.m. No.4749293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9322 >>9332

>>4749268

You're separating "light" from electromagnetic radiation in general. It's all the same, photons.

Photons travel at the "speed of light" (in a vacuum).

Most of our advanced scientific nomenclature comes from just after the dark ages, the rest comes from the beginning of this civilization. That's just the way the scientific method works and you have to roll with it, but expand your thinking.

Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 2:09 a.m. No.4749383   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4749334

I think 707 says most of it.

The Boeing 707 is a mid-sized, long-range, narrow-body, four-engine jet airliner built by Boeing Commercial Airplanes from 1958 to 1979.

Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 2:15 a.m. No.4749404   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9448

>>4749382

Anon, I think a lot of this stems from "bigger than you can imagine". That left the door pretty wide open.

If cabal can engineer the society of almost an entire planet to the extent we're waking up to they might be using some advanced technology. ET might be involved, etc.

If you don't like it, filter.

Anyway, you get this on slow bread. Better everyone is here to catch the concrete stuff I reckon.

Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 2:32 a.m. No.4749454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9483

>>4749441

Ding.

Yeah, I don't like to speculate about them though. But they are spoopy as fuck.

And the sphinx.

And the tunnel system underneath them.

Yeah… Function and purpose just lost to time I think.

Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 2:51 a.m. No.4749501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9512

>>4749458

I don't really go in for that kind of thing.

Wireless power transmission is definitely a thing, you just need a big electric field. But is it feasible to do on mass scale (with enough power efficiency), is it economical to do in a capitalist system? All I think no…

If whoever built the pyramids did so for the purpose of generating this kind of electric field (through some completely obscure means) and used it for light duty applications such as lighting, or rock cutting kek, then I guess it's possible.

It's a big universe, literally anything is possible.

Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 3:01 a.m. No.4749524   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9567

>>4749483

Yeah, like I said. That's all pure speculation, often without the actual speculation part kek. Really really interesting, and sells a lot of viewing time, but until one can show how it's done, or at least offer a testable theory it's almost as bad as the official line.

I'll always be interested in it and seek out any info anyone has on it though. It's not logical to dismiss it out of hand, at least not the first five times or so (and then give it a long rest and try again later).

Anonymous ID: 06da78 Jan. 14, 2019, 3:26 a.m. No.4749588   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9850

>>4749562

Anyone who has done high school physics hopefully anon.

I'm not saying science knows everything about physics, but a lot of the stuff we do know, particularly about electromagnetism, is generally testable by you with pretty basic apparatus.

That said, there is a difference between testing and verifying scientific predictions of a theory and knowing everything about a particular phenomenon.

So keep on trucking. The world needs anons who question shit. The scientific world is littered with scientists who were shunned by their peers only to be proven right later.

It's pretty locked down though, you really have to be part of the establishment to have any chance of changing a single aspect of current scientific dogma, short of rocking up in your water powered anti-gravity flying machine with rock cutting matter disruptor attachment.

(and please open source before you're taken out by the cabal kek)