Baker. Another docfag here.
Sauce to >>4752934 here (and attached it too):
https://www.docdroid.net/xO8cbyn/adrenochrome-adrenolutin-effect-animal-man-hoffer1962.pdf
Other texts cite the main text too, here:
http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1990/pdf/1990-v05n01-p032.pdf
Can confirm, text is legit.
You are right. Still it fits seemingly well, since the DEFCON[1] stringer is a very important one, which hasn't been really dug respectively not much discovered about. It represents a key (part of) to decrypt some other messages by Q.
Timestamp?
Thank you, fren.
>that because of the government shutdown, lawmakers in the House and Senate do not have the legal protections of the Constitution from being immediately removed from their positions, or words to that effect.
Can lawfags check if true?
>Qresearch is being targeted for violation of SEC rules for broker dissemination of ADVICE.
You actually have no evidence to back that one up. A board is not responsible if brokers who came here by their very own trust fallible information by anonymous posters.
Exactly.
No worries, I understood.
Above the two lights furthest away from us closest to the building at 4:02 timestamp a light pops on in the middle of sky๏ปฟ.
Dude, are you a newfag? This wasn't the first time we had past bakers putting useless financial data info on Notables and brokers falling for it and losing money. And what happened to qresearch? Nothing, everything went on like it did for every day. Also, let me add that marketfag drops only made it rarely to notables.
Again, you have no evidence to back up that Qresearch is being targeted for violation of SEC rules for broker dissemination of advice. You're the one who is disseminating a lot of shilly bs though.
Has anyone still got any archives of 4chan from 2003? I really want to find that one post I made long ago about Bush's dick size. Kek.
Main reason for this are common usage of energy weapons (DEW), I wouldn't even exclude usage of pulsed energy projectiles (PEP).
It does NOT. God damnit. You're really getting on my nerves now. Do you even have a slight grasp of understanding how laws work? This board does NOT disseminate any financial advice if one random anon can freely post whatever shitpost he wants to. If you follow financial advice on an imageboard, then YOU are the one who is responsible if you lose the money. Period.
The disclaimer of this board, like the board as well, do not fall under any rights regarding financial services. Really, it's so easy to grasp, yet you keep pushing this shit and sliding the bread.
>I don't think we're in danger of being held to SEC rules of giving financial advice, anymore than someone in a cafe talking out their ass to their buddy in a cafe is held to account. We don't claim any authority, therefore we can't be held account for abusing it.
Puts the nail on the head.
Well, we're not at fault here. Just de-escalating some concernfags here.
Planes. Satellites are possible, but very unlikely, considering the distance. Yes, an energy beam does not dimish over distance in a vacuum, but consider that the target is on Earth, which is filled with air. These carbon-dioxide lasers produce many megawatts of infra-red light. The laser tube produces a beam infra-red light the diameter of a pencil - which is focussed down onto a spot about 1/30th of a millimeter across, of course with the result that whatever it touches โgoes awayโ.
The tree burning inside is a very good example of that.