>I'm leaning more towards shills than tards
Me too. Little fuckers.
>All non-ClockFag anons want is for one, just one, to actually break down in detail their methods.
I meant to do that a long time ago, and got caught up in baking when not workfaggin'. I've posted descriptions of methods a few times but what's needed is a graphic w/examples. I'll see if I can find some legit clocks over on their thread and do it this week (cuz back to FT workfaggin' soon).
>1608d2 (1)
New ID huh? Ok, I'll bite. One more reply
>When you control the [utility]
sauce?
>the fact that seconds matter and are controlled on there end is abundantly clear. I mean… abundantly.
sauce?
Still waiting for an example in a Q drop where he references seconds as significant to counter my example where he specifically referenced them as insignificant
Good day.