>>4757067

Baker

Appreciate your baking for us but am noticing a lot of these notables are falling short of our usual standards, which includes having more than just a link to be included. Also, twats should have sauce to make sure they're not fakes. The H'wood stuff seems a little fluff/far-afield from Q Research also.

Anons, baker, let's prompt each other to include all elements of a notable, and to voice our reasoning when we think a note is nominated or noted but we think it shouldn't be.

6070 notables:

No text, only link or pics

>>4756673

>>4756669, >>4756720

>>4756788

>>4756813

No sauce:

>>4756942

>>4757185

>Do you want notables to be less than 3?

We don't have a standard for number of notes, other than mebbe not more than 20.

So yes, would prefer to have only legit notes even if there are 3 or even fewer. It's happened.

>>4757157

Not the same person.

This in obvs slide, shilly af in here right now.

Fug.

>>4757217, >>4757218, >>4757228, >>4757231, >>4757250, >>4757268

Ty guys. Bakers are just anons like the rest of us, we have to help out if we feel they could get closer to the mark.

>>4757219

>otherwise I'll add what get noted by Anons.

Were all those nominated by anons? Were there no anons voicing disagreement? Seems I saw there were quite a few.

>>4757348

I'm not a shill, baker. I handed off to you but I didn't request BO/BV check/monitor. I have just notified them in Meta that I neglected to do that. Many anons voiced concerns. Your notables choice is very far afield from our standards.

>>4757375

>Then bake if you feel so inclined Anon.

I will bake if no other bakers are around.

Handoff confirmed?

>>4757423

>Nice try.

Not sure what you're saying, I'm not trying anything, only accepting your offer to bake. I'm the baker than handed off to you.

>>4757484

Yeah, this is a shill campaign atm obvs. Baker's either in on it or not discerning/experienced enough to understand this.

>>4757306, >>4757302

>Hollywood is relevant since fakewood

But not rando celebrity gossip.

>>4756720 lb

This is just a husband accusing his wife of something in a gossip mag. Our standards are actual arrests or major hiring/firing habbenings related to H'wood.

And the Maggie stuff is not only old, but the pics referenced are not her

>>4757354

Baker

Disagree this is notable, and some links were already noted lb, plz remove:

>>4756669 (lb), >>4756720 (lb), >>4757227 Moar Life through Arts Digs.

>>4757670

Not about any sort of inner circle, just about basic standards which we all agree makes us legitimate and trustworthy.

>>4757645, >>4757689, >>4757692, >>4757710

baker

these were already in notables today:

>>4757385 Kashich the Cuck looks to join CNN as rumors swirl. >>4757645 I’m A Senior Trump Official, And I Hope A Long Shutdown Smokes Out The Resistance

>>4757734

My point is that we don't repeat notables, plz remove.

>>4757759

Bakers that are hostile and nonresponsive to anons offering genuine feedback will be addressed by mods. If the pattern continues, they will not be allowed to bake.

>>4757810

Were you satisfied with the notables of recent breads representing Q Research?