Anonymous ID: 04f99c Jan. 14, 2019, 5:18 p.m. No.4757324   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7350

>>4757309

>If you don't get the clock/like the clock/agree with the clock then the thing to do is to filter them. This is a free speech board.

and anons will keep telling them the clock is fake and gay, and you clockfags will continue the nonsensical circle jerking

Anonymous ID: 04f99c Jan. 14, 2019, 5:31 p.m. No.4757508   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7532

>>4757471

>do clockfags really think anyone who disagrees with them is a shill?

>No.

 

>>1) you (and I) can be sure that there"s "clockfags" who are not "anons" but work on (((their))) behalf

>most of them act like that statement is true

see: >>4757474

>Just to trigger the shills.

just letting you know it's a true statement they think anyone who disagrees with them is a shill

Anonymous ID: 04f99c Jan. 14, 2019, 5:34 p.m. No.4757551   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4757532

>And I am smart enough to not put them all in one basket.

I don't either, from my experience, it's 7 to 9 out of 10

>I am not responsible

nor do I think you are, just letting you know of the perception of anons who have voiced similar outlooks on them

Anonymous ID: 04f99c Jan. 14, 2019, 5:41 p.m. No.4757615   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7674

>>4757593

the claim was "Find me a picture of Maggie Nixon after "Sunshine" Coogan died"

you posted:

Coogan died 5/23/2018 whereas

Maggie Nixon was photographed the week of 11/15/2018 and deemed "Best Dressed."

 

I don't think you read the post I responded to, but that's ok