Anonymous ID: 8408a4 Jan. 14, 2019, 5:28 p.m. No.4757471   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7508

>>4757379

If there's anything to the clock, then

1) you (and I) can be sure that there"s "clockfags" who are not "anons" but work on (((their))) behalf

2) I am not anyone's police man or censor. There's enough clocks I do not look at (or only for a short time), and also have said enough times (for example) to not predict but rather remember "Future proves past".

For all the rest, I'd for the most parts go with

>>4757309