and the guy behind her seems to twist his junk. and has a boner.
imagine the evil doing this picture
both of the faces, Obama and the little girl, are shopped.
its a filter called "Liquify" that comes with any Photoshop version now.
It automatically tracks facial parts and you can increase the "smile" of a face.
you have no idea of nowadays "journalism", photographers shop their faces all the time to delete dirt or red skin, and in some cases increase the smiles to make the pictures sell better. in this case its clearly has been overdone.
when you know how the filter works (it just lifts the edges of the mouth) you can see it from a mile away. this picture has it.
that the girl probably wasnt as happy the moment the picture was taken as the jpg now implicates.
ya rly.
Compare both pictures attached. I did a +20 in smiling via photoshop within 5 seconds.
Of course the picture is real. But the smiles in the picture are not.
Are you able to process that in your mind?
I am a professional photographer and I tell you a picture appearing in a newspaper is no legit proof that the picture is real.
In some cases even the newspaper edits the picture to make people look worse or better.
the smiles in the picture are shopped. deal with it. and it hasnt even been done well.
I did a 5 second filter apply to show you how it looks. you can see it because the outer rim of the mouth is turning vertical too much. the mouth angle tells of photoshop of both the girl and Obama.
all I bring to the table is my expertise with photoshop, and I tell you the smiles are increased. so the little girl probably wasnt as happy as the picture now implies when the photo was taken. I dont know what makes you so angry about it, I am beginning to think you dont know yourself and just misunderstood my original point not saying the picture wasnt real but the smiles are pushed via "liquify" Photoshop CC filter.
deal with it, there are things out there other people have seen a thousand times and you not.
I dont care being called a shill. I wont doxx myself for some ignorant assholes here. My point is, this picture, that obviously has been used by a newspaper, seems to have increased smiles via photoshop liquify. dont know if the photographer or the newspaper did this, but this indicates the girl wasnt so happy when the picture was taken as the photo after editing implies.
I will not jump to conclusions why this has been done, all I can bring to the table is that I see it when it has been done with faces in photoshop, and in this case, the mouth angle cries photoshop.
now the shills can cry "shill" again.
you can also see it by blured skin texture around the cheeks or mouth region and try to reverse engineer it by loading the shopped picture into photoshop and then use liquify in the other direction.
yeah, you are a constant shitposter, not helping anyone here.
exactly.
so there seems to be a connection:
Abramovic
Podesta
Obama
=Spirit Cooking
special ingredient:
KIDS
I am not sure the presidents smile has been edited, but I am the girls smile has been. her eyes are not smiling, obamas eyes do.
so its more like a old man groping a child, child looks not happy situation, which they seem to have solved via shopping her smile more intense.
I didnt use a lower quality photo, I used the same file twice but once photoshop used the embeded color setting.
the difference between the pictures is that I saved it once as Adobe rgb and one as sRGB.
the really big difference between both pictures is the reversed smiles.
>>i made the black circle to point out her freckle is the same as in older pic,( last bread)
well done!
>>you took the same pic i posted,and changed the color contrast/temp of pic.
no, I saved one file as Adobe RGB after using reverse smile liquify filter on it and one from the desktop as sRGB and then copied one into the other. result is different looking pictures.
>>You are doing this so that people will forget original pic with circle was about matching freckle
you are speculating without proof
>> and you tried to turn it into fake smile shilling.
weel, it is a fake smile, and the freckle matches. both is true. reality is complex.
>>Like some kind of bait and switch.
dont jump to conclusions. not helping.
not the pics, the one pic, and not the whole picture, but the facial expression. yes.
it is a shopped smile. deal with it.