Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 5:18 a.m. No.4762681   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

JPM Reports Huge Trading Miss As FICC Revenue Plunges To Lowest Since Financial Crisis

 

To anyone who carefully read yesterday's dismal Citi earnings report, which was a major disappointment in virtually every way and especially in the bank's FICC group, with the exception of Citi's core lending business which traders decided to focus on and push Citi's stock price 4% higher, today's disappointing JPMorgan results should not come as a surprise.

 

Actually, JPMorgan Q4 results were even worse than Citi's as they were a disappointment across the board, with both reported revenue of $26.1BN and "managed" revenue of $26.8BN missing consensus expectations of $26.9BN, while EPS of $1.98 was not only well below the $2.20 consensus, but was also the first JPM earnings miss in 15 quarters.

 

Commenting on the surprising miss, Wolfe Research's Steven Chubak wrote that the results were "very un-JPMorgan-like" and flagged the broad-based core miss, noting that JPMorgan "has a strong track record of delivering strong revenue/earnings beats and these results appear rather unremarkable. The lone bright spot was strong NII/core loan growth, but optimism here will likely be tempered by muted NII guidance for the first quarter, of "flat versus the prior quarter. "We expect shares to underperform, with the rest of the group likely to trade in sympathy."

 

Predictably, CEO Jamie Dimon, not used to posting disappointing results, quickly pivoted to politics, and said that "as we head into 2019, we urge our countryโ€™s leaders to strike a collaborative, constructive tone, which would reinforce already-strong consumer and business sentiment. Businesses, government and communities need to work together to solve problems and help strengthen the economy for the benefit of everyone."

 

While JPM also posted a modest increase in Net Interest Income, which rose $1.2BN Y/Y to $14.5BN, noninterest income for the largest US bank declined $0.1BN to $12.3BN Y/Y and also declined $1.5BN Q/Q.

 

JPMorgan also reported 4Q compensation expenses $7.81 billion, right on top of the estimate $7.81 billion; while the 4Q provision for credit losses of $1.55 billion was surprisingly higher than the estimate $1.31 billion. More surprisingly, JPM said it built a $150 million reserve in the consumer unit - that was driven by loan growth. The question is why, i.e., what is JPM seeing that's causing them to want to set aside more money to cover souring loans?

 

The bank also reported a firmwide net reserve build of $15mm โ€“ net build in Consumer of $54mm and net release in Wholesale of $39mm. Additionally, in the wholesale bank, there was a $161 million reserve build, the bank says that reflects the downgrade of "select" commercial and industrial customers.

 

But while the top and bottom-line miss were hardly what the market was expecting, what has slammed JPM stock this morning is the huge miss in the bank's trading group, with 4Q FICC sales & trading revenue of just $1.86 billion, down $361MM from a year ago (and $1.0BN from Q3) and far below the estimated $2.29 billion. And while equity sales & trading revenue was in line, printing at $1.32 billion or right on top of the estimate $1.32 billion (if also down $278MM from Q3), the FICC plunge stole the show with the worst QFICC trading revenue since the financial crisis.

 

The bank blamed "challenging market conditions "for the revenue decline in FICC, while highlighting emerging markets as the one bright spot in Q4.

 

Also worth a quick note: while equity trading revenue looked solid at first glance, a good chunk of it is due to losses JPM suffered tied to the margin loan on Steinhoff in late 2017.

 

Elsewhere in the bank's investment bank group, 4Q investment banking revenue of $1.72 billion also missed estimates of $1.77 billion, virtually unchanged from a year ago.

 

Commenting on these disappointing trading results, JPM said that markets revenue of $3.2B was down 6% YoY, or down 11%YoY adjusted for the impact of tax reform and a loss on a margin loan in the prior year. Adjusted, Fixed Income Markets revenue was down 18% YoY, and Equity Markets revenue was up 2% YoY.

 

Surprisingly, JPM also reported a $243MM Credit Adjustments loss "reflecting higher funding spreads on derivatives." We hope to learn more on what this was for during the earnings call.

 

Furthermore, within corporate and investment banking, JPM provided for $82 million in credit losses "largely driven by reserve builds for select client downgrades."

.

_____

In other wordsโ€ฆ.we suck moar then shitigroup even with ZIRP, spotless trading records each and every day, backdoor access to all FRB ABC programs and btw you all should have been dead by now so we did not have a plan to even be in this business let alone have to report on it. WE should have been in antarctica

rest at

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-15/jpm-reports-huge-trading-miss-ficc-revenue-plunges-lowest-financial-crisis

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 5:30 a.m. No.4762763   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

US Futures have erased the gains they had last night.

Was scratching my head when I posted that last night as I could not figure out why up so much when everywhere else was fairly normal.

Now we know..pump them up to create a softer landing. Typical Wall St.

 

Ol @$51.26. Could not even get to recent overhead resistance as it only made it to $51.39 or so.

 

Gold/Silver steady on lads. $1288.xx/$15.54

Europe essentially flat.

 

Cryptos have modest gains. Ethereum top gain at 7.84%. Modest for this sector that sector swings of upwards of 30$ daily.

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 5:53 a.m. No.4762914   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

NYSE

100.94+1.03 (+1.03%)

At close: January 14 4:00PM EST

 

Pre-market

98.25 -2.74 (-2.71%)

 

The levered ETF's are unaffected by the JPM news in pre market so far. Not much trading in both so far.

FAZ is actually slightly higher @ $12.20 +.11

3x Bear financial "product"

 

FAS is slightly down @ $49.28 -.39

3x Bull

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 6 a.m. No.4762954   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4762852

add that to the list of things we can call the shills too.

 

BTW ty to all who beat back that crap from krassentwats yesterday.

Had no issues all this time and then freddy vanishes and that shit started up. At least they tried to ease into it this time. Still failed.

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:05 a.m. No.4762983   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

US Producer Prices Disappoint But Core Hovers At 7-Year Highs

(a short read but graphs tell it)

 

After China's dismal deflationary impulse (PPI/CPI slumping), US Producer Prices also disappointed, dropping 0.2% MoM - the biggest drop since Aug 2016.

 

However while Core PPI disappointed more, printing +2.7% YoY vs +3.0% YoY expectations (and fell 0.1% MoM against expectations of a 0.2% rise), it remains near its highest since 2011โ€ฆ

__

This is why I read ZH. Give me the news and no bullshit. Don't want to go to the .gov sites when this will do fine.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-15/us-producer-prices-disappoint-core-hovers-7-year-highs

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:09 a.m. No.4763007   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3022 >>3028

Wells Just Reported The Worst Mortgage Number Since The Financial Crisis

 

When we reported Wells Fargo's Q3 earnings back in October, we drew readers' attention to one specific line of business, the one we have repeatedly dubbed the bank's "bread and butter", namely mortgage lending, and which as we then reported was "the biggest alarm" because "as a result of rising rates, Wells' residential mortgage applications and pipelines both tumbled, sliding just shy of the post-crisis lows recorded in late 2013."

 

Well, unfortunately for Wells, despite the sharp drop in yields in Q4 which many had expected would boost mortgage lending or at least refi activity for the bank that was until recently America's largest mortgage lender, the decline in mortgage activity has continued, because buried deep in its presentation accompanying otherwise unremarkable Q4 results (modest EPS best; sizable revenue miss), Wells just reported that its 'bread and butter' is once again missing, and in Q4 2018 the amount in the all-important Wells Fargo Mortgage Application pipeline shrank again, dropping to $18 billion, the lowest level since the financial crisis.

 

Meanwhile, Wells' mortgage originations number, which usually trails the pipeline by 3-4 quarters, was just as bad, dropping a whopping $12BN sequentially from $46 billion to just $38 billion, and effectively tied for the lowest print since the financial crisis. Putting this number in context, just six years ago, when the US housing market was actually solid, Wells was originating 4 times as many mortgages, or about $120 billion.

 

And since this number lags the mortgage applications, we expect it to continue posting fresh post-crisis lows in the coming quarter especially if rates resume their rise.

 

Going back to the headline numbers, here is a recap of the key metrics:

 

4Q adj. EPS $1.21, est. $1.19

4Q revenue $20.98 billion, Exp. $24.7BN

4Q net interest income $12.64 billion

4Q loans $953.11 billion vs. $942.3 billion q/q

4Q mortgage non-interest income $467 million

4Q residential mortgage originations $38 billion

4Q margin on residential held-for-sale mortgage originations 0.89%

4Q non- performing assets $6.95 billion

4Q net charge-offs $721 million, estimate $736.8 million (BD)

4Q total avg. deposits $1.27 trillion

 

There was more bad news for Wells. First, as the chart below shows, Noninterest Income has been a disaster and is only getting worse with virtually every revenue category posting Y/Y declines.

rest at link

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-15/wells-just-reported-worst-mortgage-number-financial-crisis

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:18 a.m. No.4763065   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3101

>>4763028

They are trying but they have had hands in cookie jar for too long. Can't hack it now then let them fail. They are not TBTF, that was only a perception. They were effectively nationalized in 2008 it just was never called that.

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:22 a.m. No.4763093   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4763022

for sure. Not practical for most though. Can't live within means they have and used it as an ATM.

Home Equity LOC loans will start to be pulled just like IndySmack did when chumpy started that bank run by talking about it in mid 2008.

 

for those who don't know

 

https://www.housingwire.com/articles/indymac-mini-bank-run-thanks-schumer

Anonymous ID: 1b08b0 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:43 a.m. No.4763225   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Markets first few minutes and it's up slightly.

They have to keep up the facade so this is typical for bank earnngs day(s).

It should be dropping on those numbers.

If the normies get wind of actual performance it may start something.