Anonymous ID: 60d5b2 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:52 a.m. No.4763313   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3325 >>3361 >>3386 >>3619

>>4763226 (pp)

>>4763246 (pp)

>>4763247 (pp)

Look at the changes made for the film adaptation -_-.

 

For starters, why was VW changed from red to yellow?

Little tweaks, here and there… choices made to make a statement to those with ears and ears to see and hear.

 

Also, you're probably lazy, so here's a site that loooooks like it has a decent breakdown, from a cursory glance, if you wanna really dive into the symbolism. Books don't operate in frames per second, for example.

https://illuminatiwatcher.com/illuminatiwatchers-the-shining-symbolic-analysis/

 

Back to the Moon/2001:

https://mediartinnovation.com/2014/08/05/doug-trumbull-special-effects-on-2001-a-space-odyssey/

 

Pic:

"Front-Projection special effects set-up. Instead of a glass painting, Kubrick adapted a front projection technique to create high-resolution back-drops for his Ape-Man sequences and other sequences used throughout 2001 A Space Odyssey. The rear screen is made of a highly reflective material made by 3M – its called a retro-reflective screen. The backgrounds were shot on 10×8 Ektachrome transparencies, and Kubrick had to construct his own 10×8 size projector. These background images were projected onto a semi-reflective glass screen, so that in one take the camera could record both foreground and background images in one take."

Anonymous ID: 60d5b2 Jan. 15, 2019, 6:58 a.m. No.4763361   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3386

>>4763313

>>4763325

-MAGA Hat (March 17 Edition) tip-

M'non

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_projection_effect

 

https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1439&context=article

"Front projection: a useful compositing special effects technique"

 

http://www.iso1200.com/2014/01/diy-front-projection-technique-used-by.html

"Front Projection: The technique used by Stanley Kubrick in 2001 at home"

Anonymous ID: 60d5b2 Jan. 15, 2019, 7:03 a.m. No.4763411   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3440 >>3470

>>4763386

Occam's Razor is that NASA has infinitely more to do with ICBMs, Surveillance, and Propaganda (Just watchin' a show.) than it has ever been about Space Exploration and benefitting mankind.

Anonymous ID: 60d5b2 Jan. 15, 2019, 7:05 a.m. No.4763440   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4763411

You could think of their activities during the arms race as a form of public dick wagging and ability flexing.

 

Whatever they show the public; the military is decades more advanced.

Anonymous ID: 60d5b2 Jan. 15, 2019, 7:11 a.m. No.4763498   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4763470

But then if we live in a Dyson Sphere, we're back to Hollow Earth, just with extra steps.

 

If you want to go the Matrix route, you'd be better off incorporating Holographic Universe Theory, and the supposition that CERN sucked us into a black hole however many cycles ago, and we're at the last possible chance to Dial 9 and get out on a tangent.