Anonymous ID: 87e34a Jan. 15, 2019, 7:20 a.m. No.4763595   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3641

Graham: "Do you know Rod Rosenstein?"

 

Barr: "Yes, I do know him."

 

G: "Do you like him?"

 

B: "I have a very high opinion of him and the service he's given to this country."

 

[RR] White hat?

 

Didn't Q say something to the effect of, "Goodbye, RR. _ paid in full."??

Anonymous ID: 87e34a Jan. 15, 2019, 7:39 a.m. No.4763793   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3809 >>3854 >>3965

>>4763758

Let's not both get dug in too deep with confirmation bias (me, too), butโ€ฆ

 

Isn't the pattern that POTUS tries to do the right thing, FIRST, and thenโ€ฆ

 

Public becomes aware that he wants to fix something, but "gubbermint" cock blocks him at every turn.

 

Then, we begin learning how the gubbermint "works" (or doesn't) to serve the needs of the people. We get angry.

 

POTUS then begins draining the swamp, shrinking the gubbermint and jailing the rats.

 

Normies cheer instead of rioting.

 

Would take time, but worth the effort of turning the giant aircraft carriers called MSM and D Party.

 

Thoughts?