>>4765651

>>4765660

>>4765708

>>4765715

hate to be a wet blanket here but there is some truth to that, albeit the actual act is evil and should be punished accordingly, but there is also a hyper sensitivity to the numeric of age rather than development (meaning people who appear young or old relative to age can be viewed as evil despite there being some 30 year old women that look like 12 year olds and vice versa) - it all requires more thinking than "kill the person who got aroused by a 17 year old!"

as well as endorphin junkies which get off on cartoons depicting underage figures - often absurdly drawn but still ficitonally children. Where does one draw the line?

and then furthermore people who were victims of it or MK ultrad into a mindset of it - where do we draw the line of evil?

there is certainly a line to be drawn but when all is said and done the hyper sensitivity will be dead before the end of the DECLAS, I'm quite confident of that.

>>4765805

now you are a sensible fellow. That's the mindset I hope is the norm by the end of this. I've just seen so much witch burning when it comes to things far outside that paradigm. I mean fuck, we'd have to burn half of japan for some of these people given their obsession with cartoon school girl porn.

>>4765844

just trying to get people to decide on a rational line rather than the often times too quick to lump in people who, to quote the other anon, diddle children with people who either have mental disorders, addictions to porn (often cartoon porn gets lumped together with real porn for some reason) - or some other subset of activity that has no relationship to hurting children. That to me is a distinct line yet to some it's not I'm just trying to bring the conversation into rational discourse

>>4765930

you want to act lie a petulant child, that is your right.

>>4765993

I disagree, Drudge is a Q, I know these things.

>>4766014

ha, I wasn't planning on explaining it but I know a victim of the cult and he told me he was in communication through Drudge. Long story I can't tell much of but I'm not kidding. Drudge is good guys, REALLY GOOD - and I go there everyday and it's pretty fucking obvious he's a giant Trump supporter

>>4766068

when you know how to read symbolism code, Drudge becomes an entirely different experience. I can't even begin to explain how different… it's one of the primary ways the good and bad guys talk to each other - I've seen Drudge give ultimatums to Hillary Clinton in code about being locked up if she runs - straight from our military through Drudge to Clinton's eyes. And that's just one day…. it's an amazing site.

>>4766152

>>4765769

None in DIA?

>>4766085

I appreciate your input.

>>4766205

he is…. I haven't listened to him in a while but the last few times I did it was even more obvious than you are making it sound. He's been involved from before the beginning of Q

>>4766261

People in the world are pretty fucked up - can't see a different race or sex without getting a million paradigms in thei rhead of what society has driven them to think of said person. It's unfortunate because a genuine perspective is nice at times from distinct people rather than a homogenized anon