Anonymous ID: 683e24 Jan. 15, 2019, 12:08 p.m. No.4767184   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7212

this recycled QRBAKERs crap is really insulting.

 

it was stuped when you tried that junk this summer

it's still stoopid now

 

and

it all falls apart in seconds

to anyone who's fkn read the crumbs and/or has a basic knowledge of the Q timeline

Anonymous ID: 683e24 Jan. 15, 2019, 12:51 p.m. No.4767833   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4767815

they can't/don't…

faulty, costly, replaceable, hackable tech?

 

yeah right…

 

also the dumbest part: if it works, why not have some as an ADDITION to the wall?