Anonymous ID: 65935c Jan. 15, 2019, 2:20 p.m. No.4768879   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8887 >>8955 >>8966

Barr is remarkably patient:

 

"Would it be permissible for the President to pardon xyz?"

 

"Yes, he's allowed to do that."

 

"But is it obstruction of justice."

 

"If it's obstruction of justice, then sure."

 

"But can he pardon xyz?"

 

"Yes he can."

 

"But isn't it obstruction of justice?"

 

"If he doesn't break a law, then at most it's bad optics. He's allowed to pardon people."

Anonymous ID: 65935c Jan. 15, 2019, 2:26 p.m. No.4768955   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8976

>>4768879

 

"I know you've answered this already, but can you answer the pardon question again? And can we maybe go into another round of questioning so you an answer it again later?"

Anonymous ID: 65935c Jan. 15, 2019, 2:28 p.m. No.4768976   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4768955

 

It seems to me this confirms that the dems are upset people have flipped for reduced sentencing for cooperating with the white hats, and they're interpreting it as not testifying in exchange for a pardon.

Anonymous ID: 65935c Jan. 15, 2019, 2:38 p.m. No.4769128   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9137

R. Kelley now claiming sovereign citizenship makes him above the law/courts re:rape/sex trafficking. Also makes blackmail threats.

 

https://3xf8fq40r09d2057kq393vj4-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/0114_RKellyResponse.pdf