Hope so. Good digits.
Are you suggesting there is any connection whatsoever between actress Roseanne Barr and AG nominee William Barr?
I don't see it.
Spurious.
Well this anon >>4769921 is right on how anons feel about namefags. We have simply gotten horribly allergic to them and been burned a couple of times. We have discovered the joy of anonymity and wish others would do the same.
When somebody has a website, blog, podcast, JOB in journalism – anything that requires them to write/create/talk/edit on a REGULAR BASIS – especially for pay – them that person will start sometimes producing garbage. Because it is humanly impossible to be 100% on your "A" game 100% of the time. But if you have a gig that requires submitting an article to your editor every week to keep earning a paycheck, or making a regular facebook post, or tweeting to followers, then you are going to keep grinding them out, even when you have very little of importance to say. And that is the slippery slope.
How many of us have had a website or a regular gig where we were cranking out content on a regular basis? You will realize the truth of what I'm saying.
Being anon confers a freedom to speak or not speak. To speak when you know something new and true, and refrain from speaking if there's nothing to say right now.