SCOTUS DISCUSSING SUPER SECRET GRAND JURY CASE (MUELLER?) ON FRIDAY 1/15/19

SEE PIC

1/7/19: "Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed."

For non-lawfags

The Entity (owned by Country A) wants to file their appeal w/SCOTUS under seal.

SCOTUS has in on the agenda to discuss at their conference this Friday which usually means they will announce their decision on Monday 1/18/19

BUT this has been a very

UNUSUAL AND FAST MOVING CASE

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18m93.html

>>4771200

^^^ I messed dates all up

SCOTUS DISCUSSING SUPER SECRET GRAND JURY CASE (MUELLER?) ON FRIDAY 1/18/19

SEE PIC

1/7/19: "Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed."

For non-lawfags

The Entity (owned by Country A) wants to file their appeal w/SCOTUS under seal.

SCOTUS has in on the agenda to discuss at their conference this Friday which usually means they will announce their decision on Monday 1/21/19 MLK day tho so probably Tues 1/22/19

BUT this has been a very

UNUSUAL AND FAST MOVING CASE

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18m93.html

>>4771200

>>4771354

>now they are trying to get the main case reviewed

Not what I said….

WRONG….they have not gotten past the step of asking to file their Petition for Cert under seal

"Motion for leave to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari under seal…"

>>4771477

>the request will be granted and then they will decide whether to review

>i say not

Amazing you come to that conclusion when the appeal isn't even written