Couch potato baker just checking in.
>isn't feeling so hot anyway,
Is true, tho a bit better for the potato'ing, kek
Ty you both, bakers.
I'll still check in thru the eve in case needed.
>I'm sorry, should have waited for you.
Oh gosh, not at all. I could use the rest, I'm glad knowing the kitchen's in good hands. Just want to be here as last resort is all. When I have such good viewing material as Barr vs. Blumenthal to count as entertainment AND doing patriot stuff I don't even feel that bad about going full Couch Potato, kek.
I can bake some later tonight if you have shit to do or let you go ahead. I'm here if needed, but happy to keep lazing for justice.
My first instinct was to second, as the info seems accurate and useful on first read
However…
Now that we're on to them about playing both sides of the JQ issue, we should be just as suspicious about this latest push both to define and then play both sides of the "pro-JQ camp" itself. Is this just the latest roll-out of Mossad controlled oppo to poison the ''reasonable pro-JQ speech" angle? I hate to be paranoid, and I'm all for free-speech discussion on the actual problem of Jewish Supremacy within cabal bad actors, but we gotta anticipate Mossad's moves. This seems like their obvious next move to me. Anyone this rabid about any issue has an agenda. Yes, it's the Jews, but it's also lots of particular crimes and criminals and that's where we're focused most of the time. To come in here and say "stop the presses, let's talk only about the Jews!" seems suspect.
>inb4 you're just covering for the Jews
I think you'd be hard-pressed to find someone on this board more outspoken on this issue than this anon. But I'm also dedicated to winning, and I think we need to stick with Q/POTUS's program here and see the big picture, which includes not falling into traps of the Mossad/C_A niggers here to subvert and derail us.
Also this:
If the nominated post IS added, would respectful self-nominate my own post to add as a caveat/counter